Teams

LA - Queen Anne 3.0W

2024 USTA Adult 40 & Over – LA · LA - Women 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-04-06vs LA - Tightly StrungWon 10
W#1 DoublesCinderella Gatcheco / Marie Escudero vs Kendra Jackson / Crystal Alexander6-1, 6-1
2024-03-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesCinderella Gatcheco / Kimberly Toney vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-03-17vs LA-LLW-LATC-Renee MochkatelWon 10
W#3 DoublesCinderella Gatcheco / Marie Escudero vs Diana Nyad / MayLin Tao6-3, 6-2
2024-02-24vs LA - MountainGateLost 01
L#1 DoublesCinderella Gatcheco / Ira Verceles vs Elizabeth Burrows / Geraldine Farrell1-6, 2-6
2024-01-27vs LA - Volley Girls 40+Won 10
W#1 DoublesCinderella Gatcheco / Ira Verceles vs Delta Wright / Jennifer Haber6-0, 1-6, 1-0
2024-01-06vs LA - Downtown AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarie Escudero / Cinderella Gatcheco vs Christina Buckley / Cathy Lee3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Debbie Maringka
published 3.5
3.13
Andrea Dunlop
published 3.5
3.08
Gillian Smith
published
3.00
Cinderella Gatcheco
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.78
Karen Pang
published
2.77
Miranda House
published
2.68
Kimberly Toney
published
2.65
Molly Jackson
published
2.59
Ira Verceles
published
2.59
Eileen Conlon
published
2.25
Joann Davis
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Debbie Maringka
27W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Andrea Dunlop
12W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.13
Gillian Smith
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.08
3
Cinderella Gatcheco
49W–34L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.00
Karen Pang
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
Miranda House
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
Kimberly Toney
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
Molly Jackson
14W–16L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
2.65
Ira Verceles
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
2.59
Eileen Conlon
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
2.59
Joann Davis
1W–9L career · no lines in 2024
97%3%<1%
2.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.