Teams

WO Benedetti/Dunton

2025 Richmond Tri-Level Weekday · Richmond Tri-Level Weekday 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesMaya Wilder / Kristen Hager vs Abbey Orski / Kathleen Crotty4-6, 3-6
2025-09-05vs ACAC TandettWon 10
W#1 DoublesSharan Wilder / Kristen Hager vs Dina Weddle / Kristen Walton3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-29vs MTC PattersonWon 30
W#1 DoublesSharan Wilder / Natalie Dunton vs Melissa Miller / Laurie Miller6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesFarrell Harwood / Jenny Norfleet vs Jacqueline Gonzales / Anne Gilfillan6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesFrancesca Purcell / Ann Kuhn vs Nikki Schurman / Lauren Williams6-0, 6-1
2025-08-15vs TDC Spillare/Wyman Tri LevelLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristen Hager / Sharon Fuller vs Rhonda Underwood / Lauren Duke6-7, 4-6
2025-07-29vs HCC Stone Weekday Tri-LevelSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLiz Benedetti / Heather Drew vs ANJA BAUGH / Sandy Lucas0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesColette Christianson / Francesca Purcell vs Kristen Wood / Vanessa Dambrosia7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Tri-Level Weekday 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Darlene Moehling
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.73
Sharon Fuller
published
3.68
Natalie Dunton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Maya Wilder
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.56
Kristen Hager
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Farrell Harwood
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Heather Drew
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Jenny Norfleet
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Kelly Gregory
published
3.12
Ann Kuhn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Blair McDuff
published 3
2.86
Emily Kennedy
published
2.81
Francesca Purcell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Katy Knierim
published
2.67
Mary Scott Swanson
published
2.63
Colette Christianson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.53
Juliet Dagostino
published
Liz Benedetti
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sharan Wilder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katy Knierim + Blair McDuff4160% games+6.7% vs expected
Kristen Hager + Darlene Moehling033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Darlene Moehling
110W–77L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
Sharon Fuller
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Natalie Dunton
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
9%89%1%
3.68
Maya Wilder
64W–40L career · 5 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Kristen Hager
44W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
Farrell Harwood
23W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
Heather Drew
13W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Jenny Norfleet
13W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Kelly Gregory
13W–15L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
3
Ann Kuhn
42W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.12
3
Blair McDuff
13W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Emily Kennedy
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
2.86
Francesca Purcell
20W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Katy Knierim
15W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Mary Scott Swanson
9W–13L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Colette Christianson
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.63
Juliet Dagostino
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
2.53
Liz Benedetti
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sharan Wilder
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.