Teams

Hoffman-Schmitz

2022 Norfolk Tri-Level 18 & Over · 2022 Norfolk Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-12-12vs BraigLost 12
W#1 DoublesKathy Courage / Stacy Hennessy vs Angela Gilliam / Carina Simpson6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesFlurry Yanez / Suzanne Anderson vs Charlotte McCarter / Jennifer Liebler4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChelsea Jennings / Jessica Hoffman-Schmitz vs Veronica Cummings / Erin Peterson4-6, 5-7
2022-12-09vs JordanLost 01
L#1 DoublesKathy Courage / Stacy Hennessy vs Liz Tuck / Katherine Claxton0-6, 0-6
2022-11-18vs JordanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesHelen Baumann / Shelley Smith vs Katherine Claxton / Liz Tuck1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCindy Aston / Flurry Yanez vs Sheryl Harris / Kim Craft3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-11-11vs BraigLost 01
L#3 DoublesJessica Hoffman-Schmitz / Chelsea Jennings vs Chris Braig / Veronica Cummings1-6, 3-6
2022-10-28vs BraigLost 02
L#1 DoublesShelley Smith / Kathy Courage vs Karen Johnson / Carina Simpson2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesWendy Hackworth / Flurry Yanez vs Jennifer Liebler / Sarah Phillips0-6, 5-7
2022-10-24vs JordanWon 10
W#1 DoublesShelley Smith / Helen Baumann vs Katherine Claxton / Laura Stone4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2022 Norfolk Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Shelley Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.72
Flurry Yanez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Mary Snowden-Gordon
published
3.70
Cindy Aston
published 4
3.68
Teresa Jett
published 4
3.60
Kathy Courage
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Katherine English
published
3.33
Chelsea Jennings
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Stacy Hennessy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Aston + Flurry Yanez8453% games−5.2% vs expected
Kathy Courage + Shelley Smith31239% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Courage + Cindy Aston3547% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Shelley Smith
30W–72L career · 3 lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
3.80
4
Flurry Yanez
51W–32L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
Mary Snowden-Gordon
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Cindy Aston
53W–61L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Teresa Jett
30W–15L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Kathy Courage
27W–62L career · 3 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
Katherine English
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Chelsea Jennings
70W–60L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
Stacy Hennessy
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.