Teams

WNCD Babaoff (Aston)

Adult 18 & Over WNC USTA 2025 · 18 & O 4.5 Women Sunday afternoon

13 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-11vs WNCA Moody (Aston)Won 50
W#1 DoublesAnne-Marie Farmer / Jane Christen vs Deborah James / Nita Elie6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJennie West vs Lauren Wilde6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDerrith Babaoff / Anna Publow vs Susanna Saidi / Ann Stallings6-3, 7-6
W#2 SinglesJennifer Hull vs Jill McIntyre6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLisa Burleson / Bridget Hansel vs Sarah Cochran / Elizabeth Nikolov5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-05-03vs WNCK Shepherd (ARC S)Won 32
W#1 DoublesDerrith Babaoff / Anna Publow vs Beth Bosworth / Shannon Aiken6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesChristie Gales vs Yuka Angel6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJody Pearce / Jennifer Hull vs Carolyn Macfie / Sarah Ashworth6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAnne-Marie Farmer vs Krysten Shepherd6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJane Christen / Sara Naff Mlo vs Molly Heyn Vaughn / Rachel Stemerman0-6, 4-6
2025-04-27vs WNCK Shepherd (ARC S)Lost 23
L#1 DoublesChristie Gales / Jennifer Hull vs Molly Heyn Vaughn / Krysten Shepherd3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJane Christen vs Rachel Stemerman0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLisa Burleson / Carolyn Guengerich vs Shannon Aiken / Courtney Sommer6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJennie West vs Yuka Angel6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJody Pearce / Sara Naff Mlo vs Sarah Ashworth / Carolyn Macfie3-6, 2-6
2025-04-26vs WNCA Moody (Aston)Won 40
W#1 DoublesJody Pearce / Christie Gales vs Karen Babcock / Beth Meacham6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJennie West vs Brooke Garland6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJane Christen / Carolyn Guengerich vs Susanna Saidi / Alexandra Moody6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJennifer Hull vs Lee Carson6-1, 7-6
2025-04-05vs WNCK Shepherd (ARC S)Lost 14
L#1 DoublesAnna Publow / Jennifer Hull vs Sarah Ashworth / Carolyn Macfie3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesChristie Gales vs Rachel Stemerman1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDerrith Babaoff / Jennie West vs Shannon Aiken / Courtney Sommer3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesAnne-Marie Farmer vs Mary Johnson6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJane Christen / Carolyn Guengerich vs Yuka Angel / Jernine Carter4-6, 3-6
2025-03-30vs WNCA Moody (Aston)Won 41
W#1 DoublesSara Naff Mlo / Jane Christen vs Ann Stallings / Nita Elie5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJennie West vs Lee Carson6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLisa Burleson / Bridget Hansel vs Jill McIntyre / Karen Babcock3-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesAnne-Marie Farmer vs Lauren Wilde6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJennifer Hull / Carolyn Guengerich vs Deborah James / Tricia Reeks6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & O 4.5 Women Sunday afternoon have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Anne-Marie Farmer
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
Christie Gales
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.21
Anna Publow
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.16
Lane Perry
published
4.14
Sara Naff Mlo
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.12
Derrith Babaoff
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.95
Jody Pearce
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.95
Jane Christen
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.94
Carolyn Guengerich
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.79
Jennie West
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.74
Bridget Hansel
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.73
Lisa Burleson
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.64
Jennifer Hull
usually #2 Singles 44%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bridget Hansel + Lisa Burleson4548% games−2.4% vs expected
Lane Perry + Jody Pearce224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anne-Marie Farmer
25W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
4.42
4.5
Christie Gales
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Anna Publow
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
4.21
Lane Perry
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
4.16
Sara Naff Mlo
16W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
4.14
4.5
Derrith Babaoff
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
4.12
Jody Pearce
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.95
Jane Christen
23W–14L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Carolyn Guengerich
13W–7L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.94
Jennie West
39W–24L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Bridget Hansel
22W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.74
Lisa Burleson
24W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Jennifer Hull
26W–18L career · 8 lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.