Teams

ATC/Gattiker

2026 COTA USTA Adult 55 & Over Women - Fall '25 · Women 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-12-12vs TGC/BrownWon 21
W#1 DoublesPatricia Zettek / Debbie Keeney vs Gigi Dykes / Kristi Koenig6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesFrances Chapman / Patricia Kohle vs Carolyn Brandwein / Irene Kummerer1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesSonja Brady / Sheila Devaney vs Deborah Brown / Anne McCollum6-4, 6-7, 6-2
2025-12-01vs ATC/Hale/McKinneyWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Wilhelm / Melissa Harshman vs Shelley Hulland / Susan McKinney6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPatricia Zettek / Debbie Keeney vs Angie Fowler / Wanda Beard6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPhyllis Chambers / Sonja Brady vs Patricia Burke / Margie Hull2-6, 6-4, 7-5
2025-11-17vs ATC/Deming/HoeferWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelissa Harshman / Susan Wilhelm vs Denise Shirey / Wieka McBride6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDebbie Keeney / Gail Smith vs Jennifer Niemann / Bursley Hoefer0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesPhyllis Chambers / Sonja Brady vs Suzanne Jackson / Elizabeth Pearson3-6, 6-2, 6-2
2025-11-10vs TGC/BrownLost 12
W#1 DoublesSheila Devaney / Gail Smith vs Gigi Dykes / Kristi Koenig6-2, 0-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTeresa Gattiker / Maridell Banks vs Carolyn Brandwein / Deborah Brown3-6, 7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesFrances Chapman / Patricia Kohle vs Becky Tolbert / Anne McCollum4-6, 3-6
2025-11-03vs ATC/Hale/McKinneyLost 03
L#1 DoublesMelissa Harshman / Susan Wilhelm vs Karen Stonecipher / Angie Fowler6-7, 7-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesFrances Chapman / Patricia Zettek vs Pam Smith / Deborah Googe5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesSonja Brady / Phyllis Chambers vs Susan McKinney / Donna Matthews6-3, 0-6, 5-7
2025-10-20vs ATC/Deming/HoeferWon 21
L#1 DoublesPatricia Kohle / Patricia Zettek vs Bursley Hoefer / Jennifer Niemann2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Wilhelm / Melissa Harshman vs Suzanne Jackson / Lisa Lyons7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMaridell Banks / Phyllis Chambers vs Denise Shirey / Elizabeth Pearson6-2, 4-6, 6-4
2025-10-13vs TGC/BrownWon 30
W#1 DoublesSonja Brady / Melissa Harshman vs Marcheta Forrester / Lynn Baginski7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTeresa Gattiker / Susan Wilhelm vs Gigi Dykes / Anne McCollum6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMaridell Banks / Sheila Devaney vs Bonnie Howard / Becky Tolbert6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Women 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ATC/Gattiker5213821208
2ATC/Deming/Hoefer4312919182
3ATC/Hale/McKinney34101126220
4TGC/Brown2571430242

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Debbie Keeney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Phyllis Chambers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Patricia Zettek
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Maridell Banks
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Melissa Harshman
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.12
Donna Fiorenza
published
3.07
Sheila Devaney
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Teresa Gattiker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Sonja Brady
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.77
Patricia Kohle
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Gail Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maridell Banks + Teresa Gattiker0542% games−19.5% vs expected
Phyllis Chambers + Sonja Brady2345% gamesnot enough data
Sheila Devaney + Maridell Banks404 matchesnot enough data
Sonja Brady + Teresa Gattiker134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Debbie Keeney
18W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
Phyllis Chambers
16W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Patricia Zettek
7W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.30
Maridell Banks
90W–47L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
Melissa Harshman
65W–27L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Donna Fiorenza
6W–12L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
Sheila Devaney
19W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.07
Teresa Gattiker
36W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.02
Sonja Brady
31W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
2.89
Patricia Kohle
16W–42L career · 3 lines in 2026
95%5%<1%
2.77
Gail Smith
7W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.