Teams

Fiddlesticks - Weisenger

2025 LEECHARLOTTE Mixed 18 & Over Fall ESL · 8.0 X Saturday

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-07vs Vivante - VoylesWon 10
W#1 DoublesJaime Weisinger / Denise Weisinger vs Glen Dilley / Sandy Ritter6-4, 6-3
2024-11-09vs Corkscrew Shores - StellerLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichael Rhodes / Erin Rhodes vs Chris Terpko / Lori Roberts4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Peck / Ceciley Parker vs Daniel Behling / Florentina Fessel6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJames Hynes / Jodi Hynes vs Robert Steller / Linda Dest1-6, 1-6
2024-11-02vs UTC - CampbellLost 01
L#2 DoublesJodi Hynes / Jaime Weisinger vs Tom Rizzo / Michelle Koeppel4-6, 4-6
2024-10-26vs Vivante - VoylesWon 10
W#2 DoublesKelly McHugh / Jaime Weisinger vs Tim Murno / Renee Murno6-1, 6-0
2024-10-05vs Corkscrew Shores - StellerLost 12
L#1 DoublesErin Rhodes / Michael Rhodes vs Daniel Behling / Florentina Fessel5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJodi Hynes / Matthew Miller vs Chris Terpko / Joy Ecker2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDenise Weisinger / Stewart Savage vs Romulus Barr / Nediljka Graf2-6, 0-6
2024-09-29vs UTC - CampbellLost 01
L#1 DoublesJodi Hynes / Jaime Weisinger vs Michelle Koeppel / Tom Rizzo7-6, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 X Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ceciley Parker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Jaime Weisinger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.59
Nancy Aloia
published
3.17
Lisa Lamorgese
published
3.16
Denise Weisinger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
James Hynes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jodi Hynes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Matthew Miller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Rhodes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Stewart Savage
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stewart Savage + Denise Weisinger033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ceciley Parker
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jaime Weisinger
79W–86L career · 4 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
Nancy Aloia
15W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.59
Lisa Lamorgese
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Denise Weisinger
14W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%1%
3.16
James Hynes
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jodi Hynes
11W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Matthew Miller
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Michael Rhodes
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stewart Savage
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.