Teams

Slice of Love

2021 NOVA Adult 18 & Over · NOVA Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.57 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-05-23vs Nadeshiko 3.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesErin Kaplan / Renee Wall vs Ayaka Murphy / Ikuko Dimond4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCynthia Pointer / Jill White vs Danielle Frazier / Joanne Good1-6, 1-6
2021-05-09vs Tennis AcesWon 20
W#1 DoublesHolly McMullen / Renee Wall vs Amy Farabow / Andrea Dao7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCynthia Pointer / Carolyn Schafer vs Janice Zima / Donna Biderman6-2, 6-4
2021-05-02Won 10
W#3 DoublesJen Kaine / Cynthia Pointer vs Jamie Brewer / Susan Jones6-3, 6-6
2021-04-25vs Sassy SmashersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesHolly McMullen / Renee Wall vs Cassie Fuller / Kathleen Leary6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesCynthia Pointer / Jill White vs Jean Angelicchio / Melinda Capitano0-6, 4-6
2021-04-17vs MatchPointWon 10
W#1 DoublesErin Kaplan / Renee Wall vs Terry Lederer / Sarah Speirs6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Erin Kaplan
published 4
3.65
Paige Fishel
published
3.55
Renee Wall
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.45
Donna Stewart
published 3.5
3.39
Holly McMullen
published 3.5
3.08
Jen Kaine
published
3.08
Cynthia Pointer
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
HEATHER HUGHES
published 3
2.97
Danielle Davis
published 3.5
2.95
Jill White
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill White + HEATHER HUGHES7068% games+7.6% vs expected
Renee Wall + Erin Kaplan314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Erin Kaplan
40W–15L career · no lines in 2021
<1%81%18%
3.88
Paige Fishel
5W–6L career · no lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Renee Wall
232W–249L career · 11 lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
3.55
3.5
Donna Stewart
36W–17L career · no lines in 2021
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Holly McMullen
13W–4L career · no lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
3.39
Jen Kaine
5W–5L career · no lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.08
3.5
Cynthia Pointer
106W–128L career · 4 lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.08
3
HEATHER HUGHES
52W–19L career · no lines in 2021
<1%31%69%
3.06
3.5
Danielle Davis
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
60%40%<1%
2.97
Jill White
26W–7L career · no lines in 2021
<1%64%36%
2.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.