Teams

MVC Doelder SSL A55-7.0W

2022 WMI SSL USTA League Adult 55&Over Weekday Leagues · WMI SSL A55&O 7.0 W (6 player)

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-23vs GR Kessel SSL A55-7.0WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSusana Doelder / Tammy Graves vs Lin Vermeulen / Suzanne Gianino3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Antor / Barb Cribar vs OPHIE FIX / Laurie Herremans6-1, 6-3
2022-06-09vs MVR Kloet SSL A55-7.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesMargaret Greydanus / Christina Sanchez-Martin vs Margaret Steketee / Cynthia Swain3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBarb Cribar / Elizabeth Antor vs Gretchen Asfour / Pam Kloet4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSusana Doelder / Tammy Graves vs Fiona Hert / Rennae Cole6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2022-05-26vs COE Sears SSL A55-7.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristina Sanchez-Martin / Margaret Greydanus vs Julie Zdybel / Anne Witherill6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLaura Huizenga / Tammy Graves vs Debra Chamberlain-Hamilton / Jill Morena7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCindy Vander Ploeg / Ellie Trimble vs Barbara Sears / Ann Sanders7-5, 7-6
2022-05-12vs WH Willmeng SSL A55-7.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Antor / Barb Cribar vs Debra Doerschler / Gale Nicholson6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSusana Doelder / Tammy Graves vs Linda Clapp / Patricia Guernsey7-5, 3-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristina Sanchez-Martin / Julie Quist vs Donna Martin / Maryann Willmeng4-6, 1-6
2022-04-14vs HC Collins SSL A55-7.0WWon 21
L#1 DoublesSusana Doelder / Cindy Vander Ploeg vs Michelle Daane / Theresa Cusworth7-5, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBarb Cribar / Christina Sanchez-Martin vs Kathy Collins / Claudia Watkins6-7, 5-2
W#3 DoublesLaura Huizenga / Tammy Graves vs Patricia Dalman / Minnie de Witt6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-03-31vs PA Adams SSL A55-7.0WWon 21
L#1 DoublesSusana Doelder / Brenda Bezinque vs Luann Mullen / Kristin Hofman4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Antor / Barb Cribar vs Suzette Adams / Jill Farran-Andrade6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLaura Huizenga / Tammy Graves vs Tracy Sodini / Julie Zwier6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · WMI SSL A55&O 7.0 W (6 player)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MVR Kloet SSL A55-7.0W601627101
2MVC Doelder SSL A55-7.0W5111717156
3PA Adams SSL A55-7.0W4211717141
4HC Collins SSL A55-7.0W339919170
5WH Willmeng SSL A55-7.0W249919167
6GR Kessel SSL A55-7.0W1561225183
7COE Sears SSL A55-7.0W0611734218

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Elizabeth Antor
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Cindy Vander Ploeg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Barb Cribar
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.19
Christina Sanchez-Martin
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.13
Lisa Kerr
published
3.01
Susana Doelder
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.98
Julie Quist
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Tammy Graves
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.89
Margaret Greydanus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Brenda Bezinque
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ellie Trimble
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Huizenga
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susana Doelder + Tammy Graves6256% games+16.5% vs expected
Margaret Greydanus + Christina Sanchez-Martin8458% games+5.3% vs expected
Laura Huizenga + Julie Quist8656% games+0.5% vs expected
Cindy Vander Ploeg + Susana Doelder71146% games−0.5% vs expected
Barb Cribar + Tammy Graves2346% games−4.4% vs expected
Julie Quist + Christina Sanchez-Martin6553% games−7.2% vs expected
Tammy Graves + Christina Sanchez-Martin1534% games−19.5% vs expected
Laura Huizenga + Barb Cribar2542% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Antor
68W–68L career · 4 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
3.5
Cindy Vander Ploeg
66W–59L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Barb Cribar
104W–90L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Christina Sanchez-Martin
148W–127L career · 11 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Lisa Kerr
37W–46L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.13
Susana Doelder
98W–135L career · 5 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.01
Julie Quist
66W–66L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%58%42%
2.98
Tammy Graves
52W–69L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
2.93
Margaret Greydanus
87W–82L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
2.89
Brenda Bezinque
43W–27L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Ellie Trimble
9W–13L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Laura Huizenga
60W–86L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.