Teams

OC:Mix and Match:Maislen/Durstin

2025 VT Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 18 & Over Mixed Doubles Flight 1

18 players · average NTRP 3.67 / VERMONT

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-22vs ESB:StrausserLost 12
W#1 DoublesBrittany Li / Gary Steinberg vs Lisa Strausser / Frank von Turkovich6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Fokas / Joan Holcombe vs Vuong Le / Liza Webster1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesWillliam Babineau / Mary Teachout vs Jennifer Weiss / Ephrem Gebreselasie1-6, 1-6
2025-03-15vs MIT:Match.net:MarshallLost 02
L#1 DoublesWilliam Pontious / Mary Teachout vs Kenneth Schoen / Martha Davis4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Fokas / Malgorzata Donnelly vs Ben Marshall / Sara Marshall3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-03-09vs MIT:Match.net:MarshallWon 21
W#1 DoublesWilliam Pontious / Elizabeth Maislen vs Sara Marshall / Ben Marshall6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMichael Fokas / Joan Holcombe vs Martha Davis / Kenneth Schoen0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesTom Csatari / Priscilla Geoghegan vs Joseph Keil / Linda Samter6-4, 7-6
2025-03-02vs ESB:StrausserLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoe Major / Elizabeth Maislen vs Shona Mossey-Lothrop / THOMAS TWITCHELL3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMalgorzata Donnelly / Craig Donnelly vs Vuong Le / Liza Webster0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGary Steinberg / Priscilla Geoghegan vs Jennifer Weiss / Sumner Williams1-6, 2-6
2025-02-15vs TRS:Dixed Moubles:Schulz/IvanierLost 12
L#1 DoublesTom Csatari / Priscilla Geoghegan vs Dan Hutner / Sue Schulze4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesWillliam Babineau / Brittany Li vs Kevin Hatin / Pamela Clapp6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesWilliam Pontious / Elizabeth Maislen vs Daniel Jasinski / Lena Bruno6-0, 6-1
2025-02-08vs TRS:Dixed Moubles:Schulz/IvanierLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Teachout / William Pontious vs Pamela Clapp / Kevin Hatin6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBrittany Li / Willliam Babineau vs Vivianne Ivanier / Daniel Jasinski6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Maislen / Tom Csatari vs Willa Foran / Jake Evans6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.0 18 & Over Mixed Doubles Flight 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MIT:Match.net:Marshall339919148
2TRS:Dixed Moubles:Schulz/Ivanier339920175
3OC:Mix and Match:Maislen/Durstin1551326182

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Brittany Li
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Katherine Babbott
published
3.29
Rod Lovely
published
3.27
Michael Fokas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Craig Donnelly
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Malgorzata Donnelly
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Amy Dexter
published 3.5
2.90
Elizabeth Maislen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Lisa Durstin
published
Gary Steinberg
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Joan Holcombe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Joe Major
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Judy Csatari
published
Mary Teachout
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Priscilla Geoghegan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Tom Csatari
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
William Pontious
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Willliam Babineau
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Malgorzata Donnelly + Craig Donnelly7261% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Maislen + William Pontious6065% gamesnot enough data
Michael Fokas + Joan Holcombe044 matchesnot enough data
Michael Fokas + Elizabeth Maislen224 matchesnot enough data
Willliam Babineau + Mary Teachout044 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Durstin + Gary Steinberg314 matchesnot enough data
Judy Csatari + Tom Csatari213 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Maislen + Joe Major213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brittany Li
12W–14L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Katherine Babbott
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.69
Rod Lovely
38W–43L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Michael Fokas
28W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Craig Donnelly
7W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Malgorzata Donnelly
17W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
3.5
Amy Dexter
47W–44L career · no lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.92
Elizabeth Maislen
41W–48L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Lisa Durstin
49W–54L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Gary Steinberg
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joan Holcombe
14W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joe Major
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Judy Csatari
31W–71L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Teachout
16W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Priscilla Geoghegan
18W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tom Csatari
11W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
William Pontious
14W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Willliam Babineau
5W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.