Teams

LLTC - Baby Got Backswing

*2026 Houston Fall League (2025) NA - Tuesday Ladies Doubles · 3.5 Ladies

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-04vs Homer Ford - Mighty MacsLost 02
L#1 DoublesFrances Fontanes / Reagan Teed vs Andrea Smith / Yvonne Puente0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesHannah Soto / Sallie Chambers vs Carol Chang / Donna Grigsby1-6, 3-6
2025-10-28vs LLTC - Love and BagelsLost 02
L#1 DoublesFrances Fontanes / Reagan Teed vs Rebecca Chua / Michelle Nguyen1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMeredith Rabalais / Hannah Soto vs Emmeline Colmenares / Jenny Du2-6, 3-6
2025-10-21vs Homer Ford - Volley LlamasLost 02
L#1 DoublesFrances Fontanes / Reagan Teed vs Harbor Hicks / Cassidy Holloway3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMeredith Rabalais / Hannah Soto vs Yin Yiu / Alison West7-5, 1-0
2025-10-07vs LLTC - Lady AcesWon 20
W#1 DoublesFrances Fontanes / Reagan Teed vs Lily Ho / Ka Yin Karen Reifel6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRachel Haines / Meredith Rabalais vs Lolita Tan / Eve Reed6-0, 6-0
2025-09-30vs Homer Ford - Mighty MacsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChelsea Boerstler / Frances Fontanes vs Tia Nicole / Yolanda Sadberry6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMelinda Ortega / Rachel Haines vs Brenda North / Brittany Fransaw3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-09-23vs LLTC - Love and BagelsLost 04
L#1 DoublesFrances Fontanes / Reagan Teed vs Hee Eun Lee / Kim Chau3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMeredith Rabalais / Melinda Ortega vs Rebecca Chua / An Phan2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRachel Haines / Chelsea Boerstler vs Stephanie Ho / JoAnne Tran0-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesSallie Chambers / Maggie Welch vs Emmeline Colmenares / Pam Diu5-7, 1-6
2025-09-16vs Homer Ford - Volley LlamasLost 03
L#1 DoublesFrances Fontanes / Meredith Rabalais vs Aleta Cole / Karina Vela7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRachel Haines / Melinda Ortega vs Betty Chan / Florence Noel7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSallie Chambers / Maggie Welch vs Morgan Pinkleton / Chana Popack3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Meredith Rabalais
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.11
Reagan Teed
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Sallie Chambers
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Frances Fontanes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Rachel Haines
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.79
Melinda Ortega
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Chelsea Boerstler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Caryn Owens
published
Hannah Soto
published
Maggie Welch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Reagan Teed + Frances Fontanes2636% games−3.0% vs expected
Frances Fontanes + Meredith Rabalais123 matchesnot enough data
Sallie Chambers + Rachel Haines123 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Haines + Maggie Welch033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meredith Rabalais
3W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Reagan Teed
6W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Sallie Chambers
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.98
Frances Fontanes
7W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.96
Rachel Haines
4W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.95
Melinda Ortega
3W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Chelsea Boerstler
5W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Caryn Owens
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Hannah Soto
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Maggie Welch
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.