Teams

KY/LOU/MUELLER 55

2023 USTA TRI-LEVEL 40 & OVER ADULT · Women's 4.5, 4.0, 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-07-17vs KY/LOU/ST. CLAIRWon 10
W#2 DoublesMartha Stephenson / Donna Mink vs Janie Bean / Tammy Pollock6-2, 6-2
2023-06-05vs KY/LOU/O'CONNELL/POWERSLost 01
L#2 DoublesMarie Wurster / Donna Mink vs Angela Clark / Kelli Gordinier2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Melody Medley
published
4.07
Karen Mueller
published
3.97
Stewart Lussky
published
3.92
Leslie Erena
published
3.85
Nancy MacMillan
published
3.83
Ellen Baldwin
published
3.82
Wendy Knabel
published
3.79
Martha Stephenson
published
3.78
Donna Mink
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Nancy Legg
published
3.70
Marie Wurster
published
3.54
Mary Shively
published
3.27
Kristina Jordan
published
Beth Lyons
published 3.5
Beth McCulley
published 3.5
3.22
Shannon Wilson
published
Lisa Domene
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Mink + Nancy MacMillan2357% games−0.9% vs expected
Stewart Lussky + Karen Mueller3348% gamesnot enough data
Martha Stephenson + Nancy MacMillan314 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Erena + Kristina Jordan303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melody Medley
28W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%21%79%
4.11
Karen Mueller
32W–24L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
4.07
Stewart Lussky
11W–10L career · no lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
3.97
Leslie Erena
23W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.92
Nancy MacMillan
18W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.85
Ellen Baldwin
26W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83
Wendy Knabel
7W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.82
Martha Stephenson
23W–21L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
Donna Mink
107W–70L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
Nancy Legg
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Marie Wurster
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
Mary Shively
53W–27L career · no lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
3.54
Kristina Jordan
13W–16L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Beth Lyons
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Beth McCulley
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Shannon Wilson
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
3.22
Lisa Domene
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.