Teams

CVTA ORANGE

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-17vs LTA-P REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesJanet Ryden / Linda Schutter vs Kristin Parsons / Gloria Andrews2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBeth Spangler / Nancy Dickinson vs Stephanie Stone / Linda Ducay0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesXiaoyan Wang / Colleen Weaverling vs Amy Paterra / Alicia Hillen6-2, 6-3
2025-07-10vs BCC NAVYWon 10
W#2 DoublesLinda Levy / Colleen Weaverling vs Stephanie Retchless / Ashley Rogers6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-07-08vs MEA GOLDWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathy Lowenstein / Linda Schutter vs Beth Cendali / Kirsten Roeber7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLinda Levy / Colleen Weaverling vs Bridget Kelly / Suzanne Harper3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesNancy Dickinson / Kathy Depinto vs Colleen Harvey / Gia Medeiros3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-06-26vs LTA-Q GREENLost 01
L#2 DoublesColleen Weaverling / Sarah Abernathey vs Natalie Gilbert / Lori Preston2-6, 3-6
2025-06-24vs BTA-C YELLOWSplit 11
W#1 DoublesColleen Weaverling / Sarah Abernathey vs Shannon Derby / Jenny Bach4-6
L#3 DoublesJanet Ryden / Beth Spangler vs Christy Lapp / Salme Ostlund4-6, 2-6
2025-06-19vs RCC BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesColleen Weaverling / Beth Spangler vs Janice Bailey / Cindy Ronlov2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Dickinson / Kathy Depinto vs Lisa Highley / Crystal Higgins5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLindsey Salazar / Linda Schutter vs Jill Keogh / Diane Misgen4-6, 3-6
2025-06-12vs TTA BLUELost 12
W#1 DoublesLinda Levy / Linda Schutter vs Lynn Hayes / Katie Brown6-0, 6-4
L#1 SinglesSarah Abernathey vs Stephanie Saunders0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Depinto / Xiaoyan Wang vs Lindsay Madden / Diana Merritt6-2, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Xiaoyan Wang
published
3.25
Sarah Abernathey
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Kathy Lowenstein
published
3.19
Meredith Trowbridge
published
3.15
Kathy Depinto
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Linda Levy
published
3.10
Linda Schutter
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Colleen Weaverling
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.88
Beth Spangler
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.79
Lindsey Salazar
published
2.77
Nancy Dickinson
published
Janet Ryden
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Abernathey + Colleen Weaverling3645% games−2.9% vs expected
Colleen Weaverling + Beth Spangler0839% games−5.8% vs expected
Colleen Weaverling + Linda Levy134 matchesnot enough data
Linda Schutter + Linda Levy224 matchesnot enough data
Linda Schutter + Beth Spangler134 matchesnot enough data
Linda Levy + Janet Ryden123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Xiaoyan Wang
44W–45L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Sarah Abernathey
41W–49L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Kathy Lowenstein
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Meredith Trowbridge
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.19
3.5
Kathy Depinto
51W–71L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
Linda Levy
11W–30L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Linda Schutter
140W–87L career · 4 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Colleen Weaverling
45W–87L career · type A · 6 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Beth Spangler
2W–38L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.88
Lindsey Salazar
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
2.79
Nancy Dickinson
1W–11L career · no lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
2.77
Janet Ryden
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.