Teams

LATA18/Hunter/LCTC

2025 Mixed 18 & Over - USTA · 4.5 Adult Mixed Doubles

11 players · average NTRP 4.38 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-24vs LATA18/ROBINSON/CTFCWon 21
L#1 DoublesSteven Junis / Kristin Estes vs Charles Webb / Laura Plyler3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAndrew Wescott / Carlynn Musil vs Alex Echols / Madison Conwell6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKyle Edwards / Alyssa Blanchard vs David Collins / Kacey Rugg6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-03vs LATA18/ROBINSON/CTFCWon 30
W#1 DoublesKyle Edwards / Madeleine Moore vs Josey Iliff / Gabrielle DuBruille6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAndrew Wescott / Cory Hunter vs Scott Simon / Kaylin Hopkins6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJordan Hunter / Alyssa Blanchard vs Alex Echols / Lianne Wheelock6-2, 7-5
2025-05-13vs LATA18/ROBINSON/CTFCLost 12
W#1 DoublesKyle Edwards / Madeleine Moore vs Charles Webb / Marlene Robinson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEric Hogue / Cory Hunter vs David Collins / Kaylin Hopkins6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSteven Junis / Carlynn Musil vs Josey Iliff / Teri Grote4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.22 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Alyssa Blanchard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.41
Eric Hogue
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.39
Jordan Hunter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.29
Carlynn Musil
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.26
Andrew Wescott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.25
Madeleine Moore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.17
Kyle Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.16
Kristin Estes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.13
Joseph Roche Sr
published
4.03
Katie Meyers
published
3.81
Cory Hunter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Madeleine Moore + Kyle Edwards314 matchesnot enough data
Alyssa Blanchard + Jordan Hunter123 matchesnot enough data
Carlynn Musil + Andrew Wescott303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alyssa Blanchard
13W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%61%38%
4.46
Eric Hogue
11W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%73%26%
4.41
Jordan Hunter
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
4.39
4.5
Carlynn Musil
32W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.29
4.5
Andrew Wescott
26W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
4.26
Madeleine Moore
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.25
Kyle Edwards
22W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
4.17
Kristin Estes
26W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
4.16
Joseph Roche Sr
24W–16L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
4.13
Katie Meyers
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
4.03
4
Cory Hunter
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.