Teams

Byrne/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League - Memphis · 4.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.62 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-14vs Reddoch/MemphisLost 01
L#3 DoublesKarin Rubnitz / Barb Lansky vs Melissa Reddoch / Courtney Downs4-6, 2-6
2024-10-31vs Collins/MemphisLost 23
W#1 DoublesJulie Ford / Luz Scallion vs Carolyn Santos / Christine Woods6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesGabriela Harsanyi vs Adrianne Tillmanns1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMargo Gruen / Dena Mullen vs Jennifer Hobson / Katy Hottinger4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSilvia Hecht vs Joanna Fuhrman6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChristine Scifert / Kathryn Swords vs Lissa Brink / Heather Hunt6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2024-10-24vs Burt/MemphisWon 10
W#3 DoublesBeth Harty Evetts / Barb Lansky vs Elizabeth Carlisle / Alexandra Roll6-4, 6-0
2024-10-03vs Bennett/MemphisLost 05
L#1 DoublesJulie Ford / Luz Scallion vs Stephanie Upshaw / Jennifer Sammons7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesChristine Scifert vs Alison Rice2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Byrne / Karin Rubnitz vs Ana Yambrek / Isabel Xu1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesGabriela Harsanyi vs Josie Hammons0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAimee Whitmer / Kathryn Swords vs Ragan Washburn / Stephanie Sheahan1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Luz Scallion
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Carol Byrne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Silvia Hecht
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.71
Margo Gruen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Christine Scifert
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.50
Dena Mullen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Barb Lansky
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.42
Aimee Whitmer
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
3.27
Beth Harty Evetts
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Karin Rubnitz
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.16
Gabriela Harsanyi
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.05
Alyssa Pahules
published 3.5
Kathryn Swords
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margo Gruen + Dena Mullen3252% games−3.5% vs expected
Beth Harty Evetts + Barb Lansky213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Luz Scallion
16W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Carol Byrne
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Silvia Hecht
19W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Margo Gruen
17W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Christine Scifert
21W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Dena Mullen
22W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Barb Lansky
38W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%65%34%
3.44
3.5
Aimee Whitmer
16W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Dana Holland-Beickert
11W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Beth Harty Evetts
14W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Karin Rubnitz
9W–9L career · 8 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Gabriela Harsanyi
7W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Alyssa Pahules
14W–16L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
Kathryn Swords
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.