Teams

BC-AltaVista/JohnLanterman

2024 ADULT 18 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Men - 3.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.10 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-06-16Won 10
W#3 DoublesJohn Lanterman / Rich Noyola vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-27vs BC-MCC/ChrisAlexanderLost 01
L#1 DoublesViet To / Daniel Pierce vs Adam Congdon / Jeff Goldman2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-04-07vs BC-MCC/ChrisAlexanderLost 01
L#3 DoublesMike Lanterman / John Lanterman vs Cameron Riddell / Dave Anzivino0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Men - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Viet To
published
3.29
Mark Gross
published
3.25
David Karon
published 3.5
3.10
Bobby Oh
published 3
3.03
Paul Huang
published
2.92
2.92
Mike Umamoto
published
2.84
Ricardo Solar
published
2.83
Tom Bunn
published
2.83
Paul Lichtenberg
published
2.78
Robert Ng
published
2.77
Rich Noyola
published
Abraham Que
published 3
2.72
JEREMY WHALEY
published
2.70
Mike Lanterman
published
2.56
John Lanterman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.55
Daniel Pierce
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Maurice Kogon
published
Richard Strehl
published
Ryan Leon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Lanterman + Robert Ng0541% gamesnot enough data
Paul Lichtenberg + Mike Umamoto224 matchesnot enough data
Ricardo Solar + Mike Umamoto213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Viet To
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
Mark Gross
28W–14L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
David Karon
18W–5L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3
Bobby Oh
12W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%24%76%
3.10
Paul Huang
13W–16L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.03
Hector Giovany Flores
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
2.92
Mike Umamoto
13W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
2.92
Ricardo Solar
15W–18L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.84
Tom Bunn
8W–16L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Paul Lichtenberg
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Robert Ng
6W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
Rich Noyola
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Abraham Que
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
JEREMY WHALEY
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.72
Mike Lanterman
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
2.70
3
John Lanterman
53W–116L career · 2 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
2.56
3
Daniel Pierce
14W–24L career · 1 line in 2024
36%64%<1%
2.55
Maurice Kogon
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Richard Strehl
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ryan Leon
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.