Teams

USTA Atlanta/Alisa Price

USTA Atlanta Winter - 40 & Over Weekday Women · 4.5 Women (Carolyn Watkins)

21 players · average NTRP 4.88 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-01-06vs Arbor View (Renee Dutton)*Won 41
W#1 DoublesJennifer Beebe / Erin Inan vs Emma Ku / Sherri Martin7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesElisa Bland vs Erin Harrison3-6, 7-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesKathryn Hausner / Kathy von Broembsen vs Amanda Cox / Laurie Moore6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBecky Opoien / Kyoung Lee vs Ann Calloway / Andrea Henson6-2, 6-2
W#4 DoublesLaura Bonds / Ashley Hawkes vs Donna Davis / Deanna Melligan6-0, 6-4
2025-12-09vs Vickery (Angela Wredberg)*Won 41
W#1 DoublesAmy Means / Kristina McKee vs Beverly Blouin / Kelly Hobbs6-4, 5-7, 6-1
W#1 SinglesGiuliana Enriquez vs Cheryl Still6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Beebe / Elisa Bland vs Debbie Gibson / Angela Wredberg6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesShana Rutherford / Penny Walton vs Soh Jeong Kim / Yuko Hosako6-7, 7-6
W#4 DoublesTammy Johnston / Kim Gravely vs Anne Dube / Sara Crosby6-3, 6-2
2025-12-02vs Edenwilde (Robin Schorr)*Won 41
L#1 DoublesKimberly Sperling / Forrest Bohannon vs Michele McBride / Veronica O'Brien6-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAlisa Price vs Jennifer Rodman6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesElisa Bland / Giuliana Enriquez vs Hannah Haverdink / Valorie Roughton6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTammy Johnston / Shana Rutherford vs Carolyn Michels / Robin Schorr6-2, 7-5
W#4 DoublesJennifer Beebe / Erin Inan vs Kelley Barden / Sara Kilpatrick3-6, 6-4, 6-1
2025-11-18vs Arbor View (Renee Dutton)*Won 41
W#1 DoublesKathy von Broembsen / Nicole Hall vs Laurie Moore / April Johnson6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAlisa Price vs Emma Ku6-3, 5-7, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKathryn Hausner / Elisa Bland vs Amanda Cox / Sherri Martin2-6, 6-4, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Beebe / Giuliana Enriquez vs Donna Davis / Deanna Melligan6-0, 6-3
W#4 DoublesKim Gravely / Penny Walton vs Ann Calloway / Laurian Goodwin6-3, 6-1
2025-11-11vs Vickery (Angela Wredberg)*Won 41
W#1 DoublesAmy Means / Kristina McKee vs Iveta Ribaciauskiene / Debbie Gibson6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJennifer Kenney vs Kelly Hobbs3-6, 7-5, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Beebe / Nicole Hall vs Amy McDaniel / Emily Ruthven7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAshley Hawkes / Kimberly Sperling vs Judy Squires / Cathy Niemi3-6, 6-3, 6-3
W#4 DoublesLaura Bonds / Kyoung Lee vs Kim Laczynski / Sara Crosby6-3, 7-5
2025-11-04vs Edenwilde (Robin Schorr)*Won 32
W#1 DoublesNicole Hall / Forrest Bohannon vs Bevin Gilmour / Tina Norregaard6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAlisa Price vs Jennifer Rodman2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Means / Becky Opoien vs Hannah Haverdink / Valorie Roughton6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJennifer Beebe / Elisa Bland vs Sarah Dellinger / Carolyn Michels6-2, 7-5
L#4 DoublesJennifer Kenney / Penny Walton vs Kelly Richardson / Michele McBride6-2, 4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women (Carolyn Watkins) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.28 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.63
Amy Means
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.52
Giuliana Enriquez
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.48
Alisa Price
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 5
4.47
Kathy von Broembsen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.43
Nicole Hall
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.41
Becky Opoien
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.39
Erin Inan
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.34
Jennifer Beebe
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.27
Kimberly Sperling
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.21
Tammy Johnston
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.19
Elisa Bland
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
4.19
Jennifer Kenney
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.18
Penny Walton
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.17
Forrest Bohannon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.16
Kathryn Hausner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.11
Laura Bonds
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
4.10
Ashley Hawkes
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.09
Kristina McKee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.02
Kim Gravely
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Kyoung Lee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
Shana Rutherford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Penny Walton + Tammy Johnston6256% games+9.9% vs expected
Jennifer Beebe + Tammy Johnston4164% games+6.2% vs expected
Penny Walton + Amy Means10066% games+5.5% vs expected
Forrest Bohannon + Jennifer Beebe10357% games+4.1% vs expected
Forrest Bohannon + Nicole Hall5256% games+0.8% vs expected
Penny Walton + Jennifer Kenney4550% games−3.7% vs expected
Shana Rutherford + Penny Walton4358% gamesnot enough data
Elisa Bland + Jennifer Beebe5070% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Amy Means
24W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.63
Giuliana Enriquez
17W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
4.52
5
Alisa Price
24W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.48
Kathy von Broembsen
33W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
4.47
Nicole Hall
17W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
4.43
5
Becky Opoien
11W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.41
Erin Inan
15W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
4.39
Jennifer Beebe
47W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
4.34
Kimberly Sperling
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
4.27
Tammy Johnston
56W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.21
Elisa Bland
23W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
4.19
Jennifer Kenney
22W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
4.19
Penny Walton
53W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
4.18
Forrest Bohannon
48W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
4.17
Kathryn Hausner
11W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
4.16
Laura Bonds
34W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
4.11
4.5
Ashley Hawkes
36W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
4.10
Kristina McKee
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
4.09
Kim Gravely
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
4.02
Kyoung Lee
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Shana Rutherford
21W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.