Teams

4.5 CTC RovSmith M40S

2022 SPRING Adult 40 & Over - CAZ · 4.5 Adult 40 & Over Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.25 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-22vs PHX/JohnsonAntoniou/4.5MLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichael Strilich / Chris Tipp vs Jorg Wimbert / Eric Engstrom4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMarco Rovegno / Gary Hattendorf vs Todd Sutton / Joe Johnson4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKeith Cahill / Derek Martin vs Ryu Iwai / Todd Snow3-6, 2-6
2022-03-15vs PHX/JohnsonAntoniou/4.5MLost 04
L#1 DoublesRobert Keil / Arno Leskinen vs Armando Ramirez / Joel Robison2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJulien Picard vs Jonathan Gutierrez5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJoseph Martinez / Brian Smith vs Jorg Wimbert / Ryu Iwai2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Carlton / Derek Martin vs Joe Johnson / Todd Sutton5-7, 1-6
2022-03-08vs PHX/JohnsonAntoniou/4.5MLost 03
L#1 DoublesKeith Cahill / Arno Leskinen vs Scott Andersen / John Cassens4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTaylor Kim / Kelly Peterich vs Todd Snow / Chris Moore3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJoseph Martinez / Robert Keil vs Joel Robison / Armando Ramirez1-6, 1-6
2022-02-22vs PHX/JohnsonAntoniou/4.5MLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarco Rovegno / Gary Hattendorf vs Scott Andersen / John Cassens4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTaylor Kim / Chris Baruffi vs Jorg Wimbert / Eric Engstrom6-7, 6-7
2022-02-08vs PHX/JohnsonAntoniou/4.5MLost 04
L#1 DoublesKeith Cahill / Arno Leskinen vs Ryu Iwai / Eric Engstrom1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJulien Picard vs Jonathan Gutierrez2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Peterich / Joseph Martinez vs Jorg Wimbert / Peter Gladkin4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesBrian Smith / Michael Strilich vs Joel Robison / Da-Loc Nguyen1-6, 1-6
2022-02-01vs PHX/JohnsonAntoniou/4.5MLost 03
L#1 DoublesTaylor Kim / Brian Smith vs Scott Andersen / John Cassens3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJoseph Martinez / Arno Leskinen vs Joel Robison / Da-Loc Nguyen2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDonald Wilson / Chris Tipp vs Peter Gladkin / Chris Moore1-6, 1-6
2022-01-25vs PHX/JohnsonAntoniou/4.5MSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMichael Strilich / Robert Keil vs Da-Loc Nguyen / Joel Robison4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJulien Picard vs Shane Bullock1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKeith Cahill / Arno Leskinen vs Peter Gladkin / Chris Moore2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDonald Wilson / Kelly Peterich vs Matt Peck / George Antoniou6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-01-18vs PHX/JohnsonAntoniou/4.5MLost 04
L#1 DoublesKelly Peterich / Marco Rovegno vs Eric Engstrom / Da-Loc Nguyen3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesTaylor Kim vs Shane Bullock2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Keil / Derek Martin vs Armando Ramirez / Chris Moore5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChris Tipp / Joseph Martinez vs Peter Gladkin / George Antoniou2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Adult 40 & Over Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PHX/JohnsonAntoniou/4.5M7127512199
24.5 CTC RovSmith M40S1752757368

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Taylor Kim
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.02
Gary Hattendorf
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.00
Robert Keil
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.96
Derek Martin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.85
Arno Leskinen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.85
Chris Tipp
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Marco Rovegno
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.77
Michael Strilich
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Joseph Martinez
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Julien Picard
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Kelly Peterich
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Keil + Michael Strilich5358% games−2.1% vs expected
Chris Tipp + Michael Strilich3258% gamesnot enough data
Marco Rovegno + Michael Strilich2347% gamesnot enough data
Derek Martin + Marco Rovegno303 matchesnot enough data
Derek Martin + Robert Keil213 matchesnot enough data
Chris Tipp + Joseph Martinez123 matchesnot enough data
Marco Rovegno + Arno Leskinen033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Taylor Kim
76W–44L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
4.40
4.5
Gary Hattendorf
18W–31L career · 2 lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
4.02
Robert Keil
90W–41L career · 4 lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
4.00
4.5
Derek Martin
52W–28L career · 3 lines in 2022
62%38%<1%
3.96
4
Arno Leskinen
11W–25L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Chris Tipp
79W–53L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
Marco Rovegno
45W–64L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
Michael Strilich
86W–66L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Joseph Martinez
6W–26L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Julien Picard
24W–33L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kelly Peterich
16W–15L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.