Teams

BH - Durbin

2026 B'ham Combo - 55 & Over W · D

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for D have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Lisa Bright
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Janeen O'Barr
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.30
Pam Spooner Wade
published
3.27
Tammy Skipper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Celia Kent
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Laurie Pitts
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Terri Russell
published
3.00
Hollie Durbin
published
2.98
Kristi Elacqua
published
2.82
Joanie Waldron
published
2.76
Terry Schlitz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristi Elacqua + Laurie Pitts4166% games+6.0% vs expected
Tammy Skipper + Janeen O'Barr13558% games+5.0% vs expected
Joanie Waldron + Celia Kent2450% games+2.7% vs expected
Hollie Durbin + Pam Spooner Wade4452% games−0.6% vs expected
Joanie Waldron + Terri Russell8651% games−0.8% vs expected
Hollie Durbin + Celia Kent3742% games−6.0% vs expected
Terri Russell + Hollie Durbin5256% games−6.4% vs expected
Celia Kent + Pam Spooner Wade3253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Bright
15W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.36
Janeen O'Barr
18W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
Pam Spooner Wade
14W–10L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
Tammy Skipper
18W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Celia Kent
20W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.13
Laurie Pitts
24W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.06
Terri Russell
34W–17L career · no lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.02
Hollie Durbin
26W–32L career · no lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
Kristi Elacqua
17W–15L career · no lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
Joanie Waldron
17W–19L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Terry Schlitz
15W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.