Teams

CTL18/Lokodi/WRC

SC Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles Men - 3.5

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 5 played
Sep 12 9:00 AM
vs N/A
Hans Lokodi
Sep 19 9:00 AM
Windermere Tennis Club
2026-08-30vs CTL18/Ganesh/SEPLost 03
L#1 SinglesChad Cotty vs Mohit Datta1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesDeepak Verma vs Javier Uriarte3-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesHans Lokodi vs Vishal Gupta1-6, 2-6
2026-08-22vs CTL18/Hunt/GVWon 21
W#1 SinglesHans Lokodi vs Pratheek Avula6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesThiagu Chandrasekaran vs Xavier Clyburn7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesRamkumar Jayagopalan vs Wilson Pang0-6, 0-6
2026-08-08vs CTL18/Ganesh/SEPLost 12
L#1 SinglesThiagu Chandrasekaran vs Vishal Gupta3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesHans Lokodi vs Jeyabalan Murugesan6-3, 6-1
L#3 SinglesRamkumar Jayagopalan vs Javier Uriarte2-6, 4-6
2026-08-01vs CTL18/Hunt/GVLost 12
L#1 SinglesThiagu Chandrasekaran vs Pratheek Avula2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesDeepak Verma vs Xavier Clyburn6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesEric Sosa vs Kib Hunt6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2026-07-11vs CTL18/Ganesh/SEPWon 21
W#1 SinglesThiagu Chandrasekaran vs Javier Uriarte4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesHans Lokodi vs Jeyabalan Murugesan6-0, 6-2
L#3 SinglesChad Cotty vs Vishal Gupta1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 18 & Over Singles Men - 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CTL18/Ganesh/SEP2154981
2CTL18/Hunt/GV1133751
3CTL18/Lokodi/WRC12451285

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Thiagu Chandrasekaran
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.52
Hans Lokodi
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.39
Deepak Verma
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Ramkumar Jayagopalan
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.94
Chad Cotty
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.91
Eric Sosa
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ramkumar Jayagopalan + Thiagu Chandrasekaran11263% games+3.4% vs expected
Thiagu Chandrasekaran + Eric Sosa5360% games+1.4% vs expected
Eric Sosa + Hans Lokodi8164% games−0.9% vs expected
Thiagu Chandrasekaran + Chad Cotty213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thiagu Chandrasekaran
118W–42L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Hans Lokodi
122W–52L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Deepak Verma
37W–55L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.39
Ramkumar Jayagopalan
81W–70L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3
Chad Cotty
38W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.94
3
Eric Sosa
59W–57L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.