← Teams

LOTC-Lee/Walker

2024 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Emilee Plank
usually #1 Singles 73%, also #2 Singles 27% · published 4.5
3.85
Anna Reutin
published 4
3.75
Jenica Susi
usually #1 Singles 42%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.37
Carolyn Graeper
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.33
Karen Barks
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.21
Danira Bilanovic
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.06
Cynthia Novac-Yu
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3
3.01
Montserrat Coria Corona
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.82
Robin Walker
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
Results8 ties
2024-03-30Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesKaren Barks / Jie Tan vs Timothea Barnatan / Cathy Gatzke7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEmilee Plank vs Lori Hamilton6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesBritney Fang / Montserrat Coria Corona vs Kim Tellin / Constance Erickson6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAbbie Hover / Robin Walker vs Robin Fernstrom / Janna McDougall7-5, 6-4
2024-03-12Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesCatherine Hu / Montserrat Coria Corona vs Sara Crate / Rebecca van Sickle4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Graeper / Danira Bilanovic vs Clarice Brown / Tammy Cofield7-6, 7-6
2024-03-08Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesCatherine Hu / Montserrat Coria Corona vs Michelle Zawadzki / Wendy Schmidt7-6, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Graeper / Danira Bilanovic vs Julie LaMontagne / Kelly Norling6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDanica Lee / Robin Walker vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-03-01Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesAnna Reutin / Karen Barks vs Kayla Casebeer / Jeri Finn3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEmilee Plank vs Anna Holowetzki6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRobin Walker / Carolyn Graeper vs Tammy Cofield / Deana Julka6-4, 6-3
2024-02-11Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesKaren Barks / Jie Tan vs Shannon Lucas / Bernice Zhang6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesEmilee Plank vs Cinthia Erickson6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMontserrat Coria Corona / Anna Reutin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-02-04Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesDanica Lee / Cynthia Novac-Yu vs Susan McMullin / Shelley Hutley6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBritney Fang / Jenica Susi vs Donna Baxter / Christina Parks7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJie Tan / Danira Bilanovic vs Bernice Zhang / Delena Palena6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-02-03Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJie Tan / Karen Barks vs Tonya Halog / Vivian Nguyen6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJenica Susi vs Suki Birge6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAbbie Hover / Montserrat Coria Corona vs Lilian Ezaki de Araujo / Sandi Martes6-1, 6-4
2024-01-21Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesKaren Barks / Carolyn Graeper vs Lorna Goth / Dayna Porter6-4, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Emilee Plank
74W–48L career
12%88%0%
4.01
4
Anna Reutin
35W–14L career
0%98%2%
3.85
4
Jenica Susi
74W–34L career
1%99%0%
3.75
3.5
Carolyn Graeper
54W–20L career
0%96%4%
3.37
3.5
Karen Barks
35W–20L career
0%97%3%
3.33
3
Danira Bilanovic
42W–19L career
0%24%76%
3.21
3
Cynthia Novac-Yu
48W–45L career
0%66%34%
3.06
3
Montserrat Coria Corona
8W–9L career
0%70%30%
3.01
3
Robin Walker
25W–16L career
2%92%6%
2.82

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.