Teams

MCMULLEN

2021 Loudoun Doubles Afternoon Winter Women · Doubles Afternoon Women 3.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-03-26vs DRAKESplit 11
L#2 DoublesMichelle Antzoulatos / Patti Sinnen vs Leanne Drake / Elizabeth Messner2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCeleste Linthicum / Laleh Packard vs Karen Ziff / Jennifer Leibold3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-03-24vs FRIEDMAN/ MACDONALDLost 01
L#3 DoublesPatti Sinnen / Tammy Tiko vs Anne Marie Randolph / Christiane Lavin2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-03-17vs HOFFMANSplit 11
L#2 DoublesPatti Sinnen / Michelle Antzoulatos vs Kimberly Fulham / Kathy Haberman3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLaleh Packard / Celeste Linthicum vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-03-03vs MCMANUSSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMichelle Grande / Laleh Packard vs Jennifer Graham / Kimberly Sysak6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesCeleste Linthicum / Tammy Tiko vs Ashley Harper / Karen Triplett6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2021-02-25vs KOTTER/ O'DONNELLLost 01
L#2 DoublesLindsey Frye / Patti Sinnen vs Caroline Mia Lee / Tina Woods1-6, 1-6
2021-02-19Won 10
W#3 DoublesPatti Sinnen / Michelle Antzoulatos vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Doubles Afternoon Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Lindsey Frye
published
3.15
Suzanne McMullen
published
3.15
Michelle Grande
published
2.85
Patti Sinnen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.74
Tammy Tiko
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Laleh Packard
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.56
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tammy Tiko + Patti Sinnen6946% gamesnot enough data
Laleh Packard + Patti Sinnen033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsey Frye
8W–27L career · no lines in 2021
89%11%<1%
3.34
Suzanne McMullen
18W–40L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.15
Michelle Grande
10W–16L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.15
3
Patti Sinnen
92W–115L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Tammy Tiko
67W–82L career · 2 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Laleh Packard
88W–156L career · 3 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Celeste Linthicum
3W–12L career · no lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.