Teams

ETC:Godeck

2024 Flex Singles League - Fall · Women

1 player · average NTRP 3.50 / WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-11-25vs ETC:CheneyWon 10
W#1 SinglesEmily Godeck vs Allison Cheney6-1, 6-0
2023-11-24vs ETC:InoueWon 10
W#1 SinglesEmily Godeck vs Mika Inoue6-2, 6-1
2023-11-19vs ETC:GrocottWon 10
W#1 SinglesEmily Godeck vs Elaine Grocott6-3, 0-2, 1-0
2023-11-17vs ETC:BesseLost 01
L#1 SinglesEmily Godeck vs Melissa Besse5-7, 2-0, 0-1
2023-10-05vs ETC:WallWon 10
W#1 SinglesEmily Godeck vs Toni Wall7-5, 6-1
2023-09-21vs LTC:CorduffLost 01
L#1 SinglesEmily Godeck vs Melaina Corduff4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ETC:Godeck0642534
2ETC:Besse0642640

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Emily Godeck
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Emily Godeck
20W–24L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.