Teams

LGCC

2023 Shenandoah Adult 40 & Over Weekday Women · Shenandoah Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-18vs On the RiseSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAldona Petraitis / Allison Wiese vs Christa Williams / Jennifer Yoon6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJolene Lopez vs Susan Egan2-6, 2-6
2023-07-13vs Sweet ShotsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSarah Lynch / Aldona Petraitis vs Kimberly Murray / Stephanie Place7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAmy Casciano / Patti Sinnen vs Annie Baba / Jill White1-6, 3-6
2023-07-11vs Mood SwingsLost 02
L#1 SinglesJolene Lopez vs Julie Kyle5-7, 2-4
L#2 DoublesAldona Petraitis / Anne Hewatt vs Bethe Halpern / Margaret Amy Flaherty3-6, 4-6
2023-07-07vs BessaWon 10
W#2 DoublesSharon DiRenzo / Kimianne Lee vs Elizabeth Harman / Elizabeth Pyszka7-5, 6-4
2023-06-27vs StonebrookLost 02
L#1 DoublesSarah Lynch / Aldona Petraitis vs Joan Cestaro / Robbie Marchant1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLindsey Frye / Patti Sinnen vs Teresa Koch / Elizabeth Minicucci2-6, 3-6
2023-06-13vs MiddleburgLost 01
L#3 DoublesMarci Welsh / Sharon DiRenzo vs Maria Costea / Ashley Whitner1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Shenandoah Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
3.60
Elizabeth Young
published
3.34
Lindsey Frye
published
3.23
Aldona Petraitis
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Kerry Smith
published
3.15
Michelle Grande
published
3.10
Christine Feit
published 3.5
3.07
Marci Welsh
published
2.89
Patti Sinnen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.87
Jolene Lopez
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.70
Sharon DiRenzo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon DiRenzo + Aldona Petraitis0532% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jerien Okoh-Tisch
122W–86L career · type A · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.66
Elizabeth Young
36W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%24%76%
3.60
Lindsey Frye
8W–27L career · no lines in 2023
88%12%<1%
3.34
3.5
Aldona Petraitis
139W–202L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Kerry Smith
16W–17L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.19
Michelle Grande
10W–16L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Christine Feit
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
Marci Welsh
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.07
3
Patti Sinnen
92W–113L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%78%21%
2.89
3
Jolene Lopez
80W–113L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Sharon DiRenzo
103W–140L career · 2 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.