Teams

2*JMontague-Eno

2024 Eno River Mixed 18 & Over · 18 & Over Mixed 3.5 Evening

12 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-23vs 4*KLaan-EnoWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Schumann / Tammy Chin vs Dash Rajarajhan / Kelsey Norris6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesConor Kregecz / Beth Clark vs Wendy Lindberg / Matthew Feldt6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJohn Chiles / Megan Chiles vs Chris Moffitt / Amy Gillespie6-2, 7-5
2024-07-09vs 3*ABaxley-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesConor Kregecz / Megan Chiles vs Traci Brooks / Jim Cronberger6-0, 6-2
2024-06-25vs 1*ODaly-EnoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesWill Johnson / Megan Chiles vs Conner Garrison / Kristie Elliott5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesConor Kregecz / Lisa Montague vs Tanner Dellinger / Kathryn Kabat6-1, 6-2
2024-06-18vs 4*KLaan-EnoWon 20
W#2 DoublesConor Kregecz / Megan Chiles vs Amy Gillespie / Levent Sipahi6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesWill Johnson / Tammy Chin vs Elizabeth Chan / Devon DiPalma6-4, 6-3
2024-06-04vs 3*ABaxley-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesMegan Chiles / Conor Kregecz vs Ivan Andjelkovic / Ashley Holleman6-1, 6-2
2024-05-28vs 5*DKhamphasong-CHTCWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Montague / Conor Kregecz vs Kurt Rosenkrantz / Andy Blackburn4-2
2024-05-21vs 1*ODaly-EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Chiles / Megan Chiles vs Mark Petersen / Tess Johnson0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Mixed 3.5 Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Megan Chiles
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
David Schumann
published 4
3.63
Lisa Montague
published
3.60
Conor Kregecz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.59
Katie Elder
published
3.53
Katie Evans
published
3.36
JAMES MONTAGUE
published
3.33
Christopher Rogge
published 3.5
3.29
Laura Riedel
published
3.23
Jennifer Ogle
published
3.12
Tammy Chin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.78
Mary T Long
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Megan Chiles + Conor Kregecz303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Megan Chiles
154W–47L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
4
David Schumann
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Montague
25W–29L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Conor Kregecz
69W–28L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%25%75%
3.60
Katie Elder
36W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%26%74%
3.59
Katie Evans
20W–18L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.53
JAMES MONTAGUE
17W–28L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Christopher Rogge
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Laura Riedel
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Jennifer Ogle
6W–9L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Tammy Chin
85W–80L career · 2 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.12
Mary T Long
27W–68L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.