Teams

MCAC:Kenny:Kenny/Napoli

2024 Cape Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed Flt 1

17 players · average NTRP 3.25 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-02-11vs Cape:Herons:BernsteinLost 01
L#2 DoublesAlec Chalmers / Margaret Russell vs Irving Epstein / Christine Taylor2-6, 5-6
2024-01-28vs Cape:Herons:BernsteinWon 20
W#1 DoublesPaul Napoli / Jeanne Bissonnette vs Ellen Sicinski / Jim Bisceglia6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Vivian / Margaret Russell vs Henry Brehm / Christine Taylor6-3, 6-3
2024-01-21vs Willys:Sicinski Herons:SicinskiWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Vivian / Margaret Russell vs Jim Bisceglia / Desiree Mobed3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2024-01-14vs Willys:Sicinski Herons:SicinskiSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPaul Napoli / Margaret Russell vs Jim Bisceglia / Janet Sweeney6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaura Leveille / John Robertson vs Catherine Haynes / Chad Small3-6, 1-6
2023-12-17vs Willys:Sicinski Herons:SicinskiLost 01
L#1 DoublesPaul Napoli / Jeanne Bissonnette vs Jim Bisceglia / Ellen Sicinski4-6, 5-6
2023-12-10vs Willys:Sicinski Herons:SicinskiWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeanne Bissonnette / Paul Napoli vs David Bernstein / Desiree Mobed6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBetsy Casey / Jeffrey Vivian vs James Ballway / Diane Lande5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2023-12-03vs Cape:Herons:BernsteinWon 10
W#2 DoublesTim ONeill / Lauren Labelle vs Irving Epstein / Denise Wright2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-11-19vs Willys:Sicinski Herons:SicinskiSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPaul Napoli / Jeanne Bissonnette vs Chad Small / Desiree Mobed6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAlec Chalmers / Audrey Gandini vs David Bernstein / Janet Sweeney3-6, 4-6
2023-11-12vs Willys:Sicinski Herons:SicinskiWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Vivian / Margaret Russell vs Ellen Harris / Jim Bisceglia6-2, 6-4
2023-10-29vs Cape:Herons:BernsteinWon 30
W#1 DoublesPaul Napoli / Jeanne Bissonnette vs Ellen Sicinski / Chad Small7-5, 0-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTim ONeill / Kelly ORourke vs James Ballway / Diane Lande6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAlec Chalmers / Margaret Russell vs Irving Epstein / Christine Taylor7-5, 5-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0 Mixed Flt 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MCAC:Kenny:Kenny/Napoli64181231239
2Willys:Sicinski Herons:Sicinski46121840293

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Pamela Feeney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Jeanne Bissonnette
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Betsy Casey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Alec Chalmers
published 3.5
3.14
Audrey Gandini
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.11
Margaret Russell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.07
Lauren Labelle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.06
Laura Leveille
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Antonia Kenny
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jeffrey Vivian
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
John Landers
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
John Robertson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Jon Porkka
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Kelly ORourke
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Michael Leveille
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Paul Napoli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tim ONeill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Napoli + Jeanne Bissonnette261854% gamesnot enough data
Paul Napoli + Lauren Labelle7457% gamesnot enough data
Paul Napoli + Kelly ORourke8351% gamesnot enough data
Jeffrey Vivian + Betsy Casey5654% gamesnot enough data
Lauren Labelle + Tim ONeill5548% gamesnot enough data
Michael Leveille + Laura Leveille6451% gamesnot enough data
Michael Leveille + Pamela Feeney6257% gamesnot enough data
Paul Napoli + Margaret Russell2444% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pamela Feeney
112W–106L career · 8 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.63
Jeanne Bissonnette
94W–70L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Betsy Casey
68W–49L career · 1 line in 2024
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Alec Chalmers
14W–20L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Audrey Gandini
60W–85L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%17%83%
3.14
Margaret Russell
38W–42L career · 6 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.11
Lauren Labelle
47W–65L career · 8 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07
Laura Leveille
54W–49L career · 7 lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.06
3
Antonia Kenny
19W–39L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jeffrey Vivian
30W–49L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
John Landers
53W–48L career · 10 lines in 2024
not enough data
John Robertson
8W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jon Porkka
20W–42L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kelly ORourke
30W–27L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Leveille
26W–21L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Paul Napoli
104W–80L career · 15 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tim ONeill
33W–28L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.