Teams

HFTC - Constant Slice

Adult 18 & Over 2.5W - 5.0+ Women's Tuesday Night · 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-16vs LLTC - Love & Mini BagelsLost 04
L#1 DoublesBreanna Washington / Wilo Tu vs Pam Diu / Emily Hoang2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMelinda Ortega vs Kang Lu3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesDiana Stewart vs Ella Higgins1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Robinson / Amber Weed vs Lisa Tran / Jody Tran4-6, 2-6
2026-06-08vs Cinco Ranch Rosewood - Luna MusesLost 04
L#1 DoublesAshlyn Borzak / Diana Stewart vs Ailian Hu / Yun Xu1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMelinda Ortega vs Ting Yang0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesWilo Tu vs Jianfei Liu1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAmber Weed / Jennifer Robinson vs Limai Sun / Chen Song4-6, 2-6
2026-05-26vs LLTC - Lady AcesWon 32
W#1 DoublesLisa Wallace / Wilo Tu vs Leila Legal / Wanda Lockhart6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJanae Branch vs MELODY CHANTHAVONGSY0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAshlyn Borzak / Breanna Washington vs Eve Reed / Andrea Mills6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesDiana Stewart vs Jennifer Vincent6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAmber Weed / Ashley Willis vs Shama Patel / Lily Ho2-6, 2-6
2026-05-19vs HFTC - Mighty StormLost 05
L#1 DoublesMelinda Ortega / Diana Stewart vs Laverne Pilate / Mary Ann Padilla5-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesWilo Tu vs Nathalie Chin3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Robinson / Lisa Wallace vs LaRita Cormier / Lanell Parr2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJanae Branch vs Michele Thiet2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAmber Weed / Ashley Willis vs Brittany Fransaw / Monica Parzinger2-6, 0-6
2026-05-12vs LLTC - Love & Mini BagelsLost 05
L#1 DoublesMelissa Hill / Annette Brissett vs Margaret Tran / Karina Vela0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesWilo Tu vs Nancy Gonzalez1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAshlyn Borzak / Ashley Willis vs Jenny Du / Chelsea Boyd0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesDiana Stewart vs Kang Lu1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Robinson / Lisa Wallace vs Kim Chau / Trammi Phan1-6, 3-6
2026-04-28vs Cinco Ranch Rosewood - Luna MusesLost 02
L#2 SinglesALLYSON HILL vs Xiaojuan Hu6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAshley Willis / Ashlyn Borzak vs Cuixia Song / Chen Song2-6, 0-6
2026-04-21vs LLTC - Lady AcesLost 12
W#1 DoublesAnnette Brissett / Ashlyn Borzak vs Leila Legal / Maggie SAETHER6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMelinda Ortega vs Cindy Chung5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJennifer Robinson / Lisa Wallace vs Lily Ho / Ka Yin Karen Reifel3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-04-14vs HFTC - Mighty StormLost 13
L#1 DoublesJennifer Robinson / Lisa Wallace vs Brittany Fransaw / Ladricca Price0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMelinda Ortega vs Marjorie Murphy6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAshlyn Borzak / Breanna Washington vs Laverne Pilate / Mary Ann Padilla2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJanae Branch vs LaRita Cormier1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LLTC - Love & Mini Bagels7134619228
2Cinco Ranch Rosewood - Luna Muses52221328240
3HFTC - Mighty Storm53202046348
4HFTC - Constant Slice2592653349

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
ALLYSON HILL
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.79
Melinda Ortega
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.77
Breanna Washington
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Annette Brissett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Jennifer Robinson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.52
Wilo Tu
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.44
Diana Stewart
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.41
Amber Weed
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.41
Ashlyn Borzak
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.35
Janae Branch
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashlyn Borzak + Breanna Washington123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
ALLYSON HILL
14W–34L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%65%34%
2.94
Melinda Ortega
3W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Breanna Washington
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Annette Brissett
2W–19L career · 7 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
Jennifer Robinson
2W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.60
Wilo Tu
1W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
2.52
3
Diana Stewart
1W–7L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.44
3
Amber Weed
0W–7L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
2.41
3
Ashlyn Borzak
7W–22L career · 9 lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
2.41
Janae Branch
0W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
86%14%<1%
2.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.