Teams

ROHNERT PK TC/MAGNOLIA/M PK 18MX8.0A

2025 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX8.0

24 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18&Over MX8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Jake Lam
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.46
Alexis Webb
published 4.5
4.30
Timothy Barlow
published
4.27
Cory Fulchiron
published 4.5
4.06
Maddie Thomas
published
3.89
3.82
Lori Torkelson
published
3.78
Shane Grevin
published
3.70
Howard Schnirman
published
3.69
Ian Hannah
published
3.65
Gina Javier
published
3.65
Jonathan Ivory
published
3.63
Shanna Uyeda
published
3.61
Luis Nanez
published
3.58
Lauren West
published
3.54
Lesley Martin
published
3.52
Mary Gamble
published
3.44
Jennifer Anakar
published
3.43
Yasha Rahimzadeh
published
3.42
Leslie Grevin
published
3.12
Michele Andersen
published
Erik Sherley
published
Jonathan Bergland
published
Sara C Mazza
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Howard Schnirman + Lauren West2346% games+1.6% vs expected
Shane Grevin + Leslie Grevin1737% games−5.5% vs expected
Alexis Webb + Jonathan Bergland7258% gamesnot enough data
Mary Gamble + Luis Nanez123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jake Lam
22W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
4.51
4.5
Alexis Webb
15W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
4.46
Timothy Barlow
17W–13L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Cory Fulchiron
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
Maddie Thomas
61W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
4.06
4
Ariadile Goes Mariano
15W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.89
Lori Torkelson
23W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Shane Grevin
12W–13L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Howard Schnirman
7W–25L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Ian Hannah
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Gina Javier
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.65
Jonathan Ivory
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.65
Shanna Uyeda
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
Luis Nanez
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
3.61
Lauren West
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Lesley Martin
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
Mary Gamble
22W–24L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.52
Jennifer Anakar
5W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Yasha Rahimzadeh
16W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Leslie Grevin
6W–19L career · no lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.42
Michele Andersen
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Erik Sherley
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jonathan Bergland
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sara C Mazza
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.