Teams

MPettit (OPRC)

2022 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Women - Tues PM

7 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-08-02Won 10
W#3 SinglesMargy Pettit vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-12vs CGreen (Life Time)Won 10
W#3 SinglesMargy Pettit vs Marie McDaniel6-2, 6-0
2022-06-21vs KCochran (Queens)Lost 01
L#3 SinglesMargy Pettit vs Megan Griffin1-6, 3-6
2022-05-31Lost 01
L#3 SinglesMargy Pettit vs Mary Peterson0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Women - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Eryn Ratcliffe
published 4.5
4.18
Jennifer Gardiner
published
3.96
Suzy Johnson
published
3.83
Amanda Meloni
published 4
3.58
Margy Pettit
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.49
Susan Ahlborn
published
Kristen Montgomery
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzy Johnson + Eryn Ratcliffe314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Eryn Ratcliffe
22W–20L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
4.24
Jennifer Gardiner
38W–32L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
4.18
Suzy Johnson
55W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Amanda Meloni
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Margy Pettit
51W–73L career · 4 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
Susan Ahlborn
3W–10L career · no lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
3.49
Kristen Montgomery
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.