Teams

Pa.Mital18M

2026 Capital Mixed 18 & Over · 4.5

15 players · average NTRP 4.45 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-02vs He.Remley18MWon 21
L#1 DoublesAndrew Dinicola / McKinsey Blount vs Ben Glass / Mary-Katherine Martin4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesWes Watson / Alexis Galloway vs Casey Black / Karen Griffin2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesParv Mital / Amanda Linke vs Christopher Brown / Anna Tomkins6-2, 6-4
2026-07-26vs Co.Vinson18MWon 20
W#1 DoublesEmmanuel Oye / Meghan Zerkel vs Meryl Golder / Winston Pantelakos7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWes Watson / Alexis Galloway vs Colleen Brown / Russell Riley7-6, 3-1
2026-07-16vs Co.Vinson18MLost 12
L#1 DoublesRaymond Xu / Meghan Zerkel vs Colleen Brown / Ryan Walter4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesWes Watson / Claire Songkakul vs Winston Pantelakos / Leigh Barter7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesZoe Dubrow / Tyler Carroll vs Allison Ostrander / Bradford Aron6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-07-12vs He.Remley18MWon 21
W#1 DoublesWes Watson / McKinsey Blount vs Parker Sheridan / MaryBeth Jackson6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTyler Carroll / Alexis Galloway vs Matt Skelly / Anna Tomkins2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRaymond Xu / Ana Maria Keating vs Andrew Perdue / Brooke DeMarco6-4, 6-1
2026-07-05vs Co.Vinson18MLost 12
L#1 DoublesTyler Carroll / Claire Songkakul vs Patrick Grant / Hadley Misenheimer6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesWes Watson / Amanda Linke vs Patrick Shields / Leigh Barter7-6, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAna Maria Keating / Parv Mital vs Colleen Brown / Russell Riley6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2026-06-21vs He.Remley18MLost 12
L#1 DoublesWilliam Martin / Amanda Linke vs Andrew Perdue / MaryBeth Jackson3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesAndrew Dinicola / McKinsey Blount vs Owen McGrew / Paulina Fernanda Delgado Andrade3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRaymond Xu / Zoe Dubrow vs Ben Glass / Mary-Katherine Martin1-6, 1-6
2026-05-31vs He.Remley18MLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndrew Dinicola / Amanda Linke vs Owen McGrew / Anna Tomkins7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWes Watson / Meghan Zerkel vs Matt Skelly / Paulina Fernanda Delgado Andrade5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTyler Carroll / Charlie Trinco vs Ben Glass / Karen Griffin6-7, 1-6
2026-05-24vs Co.Vinson18MLost 12
L#1 DoublesEmmanuel Oye / McKinsey Blount vs Colleen Brown / Patrick Shields4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesClaire Songkakul / William Martin vs Bradford Aron / Leigh Barter6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAndrew Dinicola / Zoe Dubrow vs Evan Wharton / Hadley Misenheimer2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1He.Remley18M6217718208
2Pa.Mital18M35101432246
3Co.Vinson18M3591534253

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.26 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
Parv Mital
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.44
Andrew Dinicola
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.35
McKinsey Blount
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.31
Tyler Carroll
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.28
Ana Maria Keating
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.26
Wes Watson
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.25
Alexis Galloway
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.24
Amanda Linke
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.24
Meghan Zerkel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.23
Charlie Trinco
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.22
Zoe Dubrow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.20
Raymond Xu
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.17
Emmanuel Oye
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.01
Claire Songkakul
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
William Martin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

McKinsey Blount + Andrew Dinicola224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Parv Mital
35W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
4.48
4.5
Andrew Dinicola
46W–44L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
4.44
4.5
McKinsey Blount
65W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
4.35
Tyler Carroll
29W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
4.31
4.5
Ana Maria Keating
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Wes Watson
154W–128L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
4.26
4.5
Alexis Galloway
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Amanda Linke
46W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
4.24
Meghan Zerkel
8W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Charlie Trinco
18W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Zoe Dubrow
101W–75L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.22
Raymond Xu
30W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Emmanuel Oye
5W–2L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
4.17
4
Claire Songkakul
107W–44L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
4.01
William Martin
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.