Teams

High Point/Kemp M8.0

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 65 & Over ADULT Friday · M8.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-15vs Brookhaven/Bartlett M8.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesTres Cushing / Andrew Steinbeck vs Tom Adcock / Brad Westcott3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJoe Giovino / James Musil vs Lance Loesberg / Daniel Barta5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDouglas Bridges / Rockland Berg vs Timothy Montgomery / Richard Shaw4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-05-08vs Oak Creek/Rajani-Mueller M8.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesDouglas Bridges / Lance Groves vs Mike Buster / Jeffrey Lang5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesTommy Barrett / Russ Johnson vs Atul Rajani / Son Do6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTres Cushing / Andrew Steinbeck vs Doug Walker / Gary Paparella6-2, 6-1
2026-04-24vs High Point/Sweeney M8.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesWarren Gradick / Joe Giovino vs Robert Barrie / Charles Rasor2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTommy Barrett / Dick Fikes vs Brad Clark / Peter Neufeld6-2, 6-2
2026-04-17vs Lifetime Plano/Freshwater-Kemp M8.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesDick Fikes / John Foster vs Mike Thomas / John Schreck3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesWarren Gradick / Joe Giovino vs Dennis Haines / Russel Head6-2, 7-6
2026-04-10vs Brookhaven/Bartlett M8.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesDick Fikes / John Foster vs James Shields / Marc Myrin6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRuss Johnson / William Miranda vs Tom Adcock / Brad Westcott6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesGary Blankenmeister / Rockland Berg vs Richard Shaw / Lance Loesberg6-3, 6-4
2026-04-03vs Oak Creek/Rajani-Mueller M8.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesRuss Johnson / William Miranda vs Jeffrey Lang / Bernd Mueller6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDick Fikes / John Foster vs Ramesh Balan / Mike Buster6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesPhil McGregor / Warren Gradick vs Doug Walker / Atul Rajani7-6, 6-1
2026-03-20vs High Point/Sweeney M8.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesLance Groves / Phil McGregor vs Robert Barrie / Paul Wildberger7-6
W#2 DoublesSteven Cormier / Joe Giovino vs John Steven Canan / Robert Rubel6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJohn Foster / William Miranda vs Brad Clark / Peter Neufeld2-6, 4-6
2026-03-13vs Lifetime Plano/Freshwater-Kemp M8.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesDick Fikes / John Foster vs Mario Dominguez / John Schreck3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesGary Blankenmeister / Steven Cormier vs Mike Sullivan / Mark Schiller6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · M8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1High Point/Kemp M8.06216818188
2High Point/Sweeney M8.05315921175
3Brookhaven/Bartlett M8.044101432236
4Lifetime Plano/Freshwater-Kemp M8.035101430223
5Oak Creek/Rajani-Mueller M8.02691534245

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Russ Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.94
Tommy Barrett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Steven Cormier
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.85
Dick Fikes
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.84
Joe Giovino
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.50
Andrew Steinbeck
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Douglas Bridges
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Gary Blankenmeister
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
James Musil
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
Lance Groves
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Phil McGregor
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Rockland Berg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Steve Kemp
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Tres Cushing
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Warren Gradick
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
William Miranda
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steven Cormier + Tommy Barrett314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Russ Johnson
13W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
4.02
Tommy Barrett
10W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.94
Steven Cormier
13W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.92
4
Dick Fikes
8W–3L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
Joe Giovino
24W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.84
3.5
Andrew Steinbeck
13W–5L career · type A · 9 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.50
Douglas Bridges
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Gary Blankenmeister
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
James Musil
7W–6L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lance Groves
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Phil McGregor
8W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rockland Berg
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Steve Kemp
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tres Cushing
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Warren Gradick
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
William Miranda
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.