Teams

Payne Park Evening Narwhals

2026 Sarasota Combo 50 & Over Fall Weeknight · 7.5 W Tuesday EVE

9 players · average NTRP 3.64 / REGION_5

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings3 teams · 7.5 W Tuesday EVE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Payne Park Evening Narwhals000000
2TPC Tue Eve 7.5 50+000000
3Payne Park Marina 7.5000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Rachel Rocks
published 4
3.73
3.55
Theresa Watson
published
3.51
Jacqueline Dezelski
published 3.5
3.47
3.43
Bev Murray
published 3.5
3.39
Rebecca Zion
published 3.5
3.23
Thao Ross
published 3.5
3.21
Patty Avery
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachel Rocks + Theresa Watson2351% games+8.7% vs expected
Bev Murray + Rebecca Zion12464% games+1.2% vs expected
Thao Ross + Rebecca Zion8360% games+0.9% vs expected
Bev Murray + Jacqueline Dezelski4458% games−0.9% vs expected
Thao Ross + Bev Murray10557% games−2.0% vs expected
Deborah Lenart-Costellone + Bev Murray224 matchesnot enough data
Deborah Lenart-Costellone + Thao Ross213 matchesnot enough data
Patty Avery + Rebecca Zion303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Rachel Rocks
40W–74L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Jacqueline Borden
24W–14L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.73
Theresa Watson
4W–14L career · no lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.55
3.5
Jacqueline Dezelski
43W–22L career · no lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Deborah Lenart-Costellone
24W–19L career · no lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Bev Murray
71W–40L career · no lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Rebecca Zion
67W–41L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Thao Ross
73W–54L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Patty Avery
14W–16L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.