Teams

MRoach-CHCC

2026 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 Over Adult 3.0 Men Evening

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-06vs SWhitt-UNCSplit 22
L#1 DoublesLucas Beal / Tom Porter vs Adam Hantman / Richard Saver3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAlfred Leach vs Meng Chen1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJeff Biersach / Buck Phillips vs Tim Turner / Tony Perucci6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMark Oakley / Thomas Miller vs Robert Miller / Scott Whitt6-2, 6-1
2026-04-29vs DNagelhout-HSSplit 22
W#1 DoublesTom Porter / Jeff Biersach vs David Evert / DAVID DELINSKY6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesTom Wollman vs Reggie Oakley6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBuck Phillips / Thomas Miller vs Andy Jones / Jeff Denhard3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChris Harris / Doug Holroyd vs Dirk Kumashiro / Leon Grodski Barrera1-6, 2-6
2026-04-22vs SWhitt-UNCWon 31
W#1 DoublesAaron Meadows / Tom Porter vs Brett Bushnell / Robert Miller4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLucas Beal vs Josh Gouker0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJeff Biersach / Richard Fisher vs Tony Perucci / Duane Decapite6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAlfred Leach / Steve Travers vs Scott Whitt / Richard Saver7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2026-04-16vs SClausnitzer-CHCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlfred Leach / David Zvara vs Steven Clausnitzer / Charles Burke0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAaron Meadows vs Ryan Bialas1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesThomas Miller / Buck Phillips vs Sammy Myers / Jim Brantley2-6, 2-6
2026-04-15vs MLong.M.40-DURLost 13
W#1 DoublesRichard Fisher / Lucas Beal vs Daud Tareen / FJ Magee6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesTom Porter vs Andrew Hedgpeth2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesThomas Miller / Aaron Meadows vs Mark Rhoades / Matthew Davies3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesChris Harris / Steve Travers vs Brian Goldman / Ryan Boyles3-6, 3-6
2026-04-01vs MBland-CHTCLost 13
L#1 DoublesTom Wollman / Richard Fisher vs Mark Bland / CHARLES ENDERLINE4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesTom Porter vs Bill Stewart3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAlfred Leach / Aaron Meadows vs Erik Milz / Charles Fisher6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesPhilip Gilchrist / David Zvara vs Ed Slanker / Derek Phillips0-6, 0-6
2026-03-11vs AHabib-HRLost 04
L#1 DoublesTom Wollman / Lucas Beal vs James Bowers / Marcus Acheson6-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesGordon Gardinier vs Caleb Kent0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAlfred Leach / Mark Oakley vs Ashraf Habib / Matthew Feldt4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Zvara / Doug Holroyd vs BRIAN KING / Matt Williamson4-6, 2-6
2026-02-25vs MLong.M.40-DURLost 04
L#1 DoublesJeff Biersach / Richard Fisher vs Travis Angle / Matthew Davies6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTom Wollman vs Andrew Hedgpeth2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChris Harris / Gordon Gardinier vs Rick Edmunds / Robert Long5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Roach / Steve Travers vs Daud Tareen / Steven Rochkind5-7, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 40 Over Adult 3.0 Men Evening
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1AHabib-HR7125720215
2SWhitt-UNC44191329251
3MLong.M.40-DUR44122042301
4MBland-CHTC35131943317
5MRoach-CHCC35102246305
6DNagelhout-HS0872552337

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Jeff Biersach
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Aaron Meadows
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.73
Mark Oakley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.70
Tom Porter
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.67
Tom Wollman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.65
Buck Phillips
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
David Zvara
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.61
Alfred Leach
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.58
Lucas Beal
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.44
Philip Gilchrist
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Gordon Gardinier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.38
Steve Travers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.35
Doug Holroyd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeff Biersach + Tom Porter213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Biersach
5W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Aaron Meadows
7W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Mark Oakley
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Tom Porter
7W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
Tom Wollman
5W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Buck Phillips
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
2.65
3
David Zvara
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.62
3
Alfred Leach
2W–5L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.61
Lucas Beal
2W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
2.58
Philip Gilchrist
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.44
Gordon Gardinier
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
2.42
Steve Travers
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.38
Doug Holroyd
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
86%14%<1%
2.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.