Teams

KStronach

2022 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 9.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-23vs HRemley - CAP 9.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesSarah Barnhill / Jeni Burnette vs Heather Remley / Tanita Tedamrongwanish6-4, 6-2
2022-10-09vs EPiechocinskiWon 10
W#2 DoublesFrances Finch / Kathie Stronach vs Cheryl Hamel / Tiffany Holbrook3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-10-02vs HRemley - CAP 9.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesEmily Perry / Gina Minton vs Mia Bobrowski / Jennifer Hiller1-6, 1-6
2022-09-25vs ESpeicherWon 20
W#2 DoublesSarah Barnhill / Jeni Burnette vs Rachel Davis / Jennifer Reese6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKathie Stronach / HEATHER WATERS vs Femi Perry / Lorraine Bowen6-3, 6-4
2022-09-18vs EPiechocinskiWon 10
W#2 DoublesSarah Barnhill / Jeni Burnette vs Mary Hartley / Amelia Blankenship6-1, 6-0
2022-09-11vs HRemley - CAP 9.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBonnie Stabler / Kathie Stronach vs Mia Bobrowski / Heather Remley6-7, 2-6
2022-08-28vs EPiechocinskiLost 01
L#1 DoublesFrances Finch / Gina Minton vs Elizabeth Perkins / Erin Piechocinski2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.46 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.99
Jeni Burnette
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.80
Alice Stubbs
published 5
4.66
Sarah Barnhill
published
4.63
Bonnie Stabler
published 5
4.62
Emily Perry
published 5
4.43
Neal Goodwin
published
4.39
Kathie Stronach
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.14
Molly Painter
published
4.02
Gina Minton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 4.5
3.90
Kathleen Fisher
published
Karen Rothschild
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeni Burnette + Emily Perry7266% games+2.3% vs expected
Emily Perry + Alice Stubbs314 matchesnot enough data
Gina Minton + Kathie Stronach123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Jeni Burnette
52W–23L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
4.99
5
Alice Stubbs
6W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.80
Sarah Barnhill
7W–1L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
4.66
5
Bonnie Stabler
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
4.63
5
Emily Perry
14W–10L career · no lines in 2022
18%81%<1%
4.62
Neal Goodwin
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
4.43
4.5
Kathie Stronach
78W–47L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
4.39
Molly Painter
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
4.14
4.5
Gina Minton
47W–60L career · 9 lines in 2022
44%55%<1%
4.02
Kathleen Fisher
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
79%21%<1%
3.90
Karen Rothschild
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.