Teams

MAC-Ferguson/Bigley

2022 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.12 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Wendy Whitsell
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Heather Edwards
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.07
Adrienne Dedelow
usually #2 Singles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.96
Jacquelyn Miller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Grayson Dempsey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Patries Ferguson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.56
Ellen Wood
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.43
Susan Sienko
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Results9 ties
2022-06-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesWendy Whitsell / Jacquelyn Miller vs Robin Welter / Nicole Vedder7-6, 6-2
2022-03-12Won 31
W#1 DoublesGretchen Sturm / Patries Ferguson vs Sarie Crothers / Megan Ullmann7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesHeather Edwards vs Tracy Laidley6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesWendy Whitsell / Deanna Phillips vs Heather Matteri / Erin Gleason2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAdrienne Dedelow vs Laurel Hallock Koppelman6-1, 6-1
2022-03-06Lost 02
L#2 SinglesWendy Whitsell vs Cinthia Erickson6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMolly Hisatomi / Grayson Dempsey vs Tomoko Langworthy / Andria Neathamer7-6, 6-3
2022-02-25Won 21
W#1 DoublesJacquelyn Miller / Patries Ferguson vs Diana Crawford / Jeane Anastas6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesShelly Bigley / Wendy Whitsell vs Kim Tellin / Mckenzie Crawford6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesAdrienne Dedelow vs April Mayers7-6, 6-2
2022-02-19Won 31
W#1 DoublesShelly Bigley / Wendy Whitsell vs Robin Browne / Kristin Morris6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesHeather Edwards vs Brittany Donnelly6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPatries Ferguson / Molly Hisatomi vs Miriam Latzer / Caroline Davidson6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGrayson Dempsey / Laura Walker vs Pearl Lee / Wen-Li Jao6-0, 6-2
2022-02-13Lost 13
W#1 DoublesPatries Ferguson / Jacquelyn Miller vs Melissa Bothne / Kyle McAvoy6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSusan Sienko / Emily Shields vs Hildie Oliver / Whitney Mam6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesAdrienne Dedelow vs Barbara Dusicka7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLaura Walker / Heather Edwards vs Simone Frank / Jennifer Thompson6-4, 6-0
2022-01-30Lost 03
L#2 DoublesPatries Ferguson / Gretchen Sturm vs Patricia Eargle / Andrea Hobi7-5, 6-0
L#2 SinglesAdrienne Dedelow vs Victoria Cartwright7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesWendy Whitsell / Shelly Bigley vs Cricket Forsey / Lisa McBee5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-01-15Split 22
W#1 DoublesWendy Whitsell / Gretchen Sturm vs Ellen Bradley / Laura Rich6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesHeather Edwards vs Jane Shu6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAdrienne Dedelow vs Janet Ha6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Sienko / Ellen Wood vs Catherine Huang / Lisa King7-6, 6-4
2022-01-09Lost 02
L#2 SinglesWendy Whitsell vs Sheryl Riley6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGrayson Dempsey / Adrienne Dedelow vs Teufelin Traylen / Ilona Vondolovski7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Wendy Whitsell
33W–25L career
not enough data
3.5
Heather Edwards
95W–67L career · type A
2%98%0%
3.21
3
Adrienne Dedelow
35W–35L career
0%62%38%
3.07
3
Jacquelyn Miller
29W–28L career
0%77%22%
2.96
3
Grayson Dempsey
40W–39L career
0%96%4%
2.86
3
Patries Ferguson
29W–31L career
not enough data
3
Ellen Wood
43W–79L career · type A
20%80%0%
2.56
3
Susan Sienko
28W–77L career · type A
52%48%0%
2.43

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.