Teams

UPTA40C/Golden/Brookstone

2025 UPTA Combo 40 & Over - SC · 40+ Combo Women - 5.5

14 players · average NTRP 2.88 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-18vs UPTA40C/Herford/PavilionLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Hassey / Melissa Maude vs Brie Soler / Mary Sansbury2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCathy Feinstein / Kelley Golden vs Dorelly Herford / Mary Duff Rayneri6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDeborah B Bowyer / Trish Scott vs Patricia Surles / Melissa Studebaker3-6, 2-6
2025-09-04vs UPTA40C/Smith/HollyTreeWon 21
L#1 DoublesLinda Musgrave / Sunny Davis vs Alicia Walters / Michelle Callahan6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKelley Golden / Vicki Bridges vs Madina Cauthen / Tabitha Taylor6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMelissa Maude / Michele Davenport vs Grae Turner / Susan San Francisco6-4, 6-2
2025-08-28vs UPTA40C/Herford/PavilionLost 03
L#1 DoublesMelissa Maude / Cathy Feinstein vs Elizabeth Raduns / Lora Pfohl6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDeborah B Bowyer / Johnel Searcy vs Melissa Studebaker / Patricia Surles3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Shuler / Daphne Wiles vs Dorelly Herford / Bobbi Bateman0-6, 1-6
2025-08-25vs UPTA40C/Smith/HollyTreeLost 12
W#1 DoublesMelissa Maude / Carolyn Hassey vs Madina Cauthen / Kelly Johnson6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTrish Scott / Kelly Shuler vs Gretchen Lawson / Katherine Burnett2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKelley Golden / Loran Hardigree vs Tarah M Smith / Michelle Callahan2-6, 6-7
2025-08-21vs UPTA40C/Zeimetz/Hwy14Won 21
W#1 DoublesMelissa Maude / Cathy Feinstein vs Shellie Corley / Sandy Shaw6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKelley Golden / Deborah B Bowyer vs Maryteal Oneal / JB Robinson6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKelly Shuler / Trish Scott vs Tracy Chastain / Ashley Rehn7-5, 7-6
2025-08-07vs UPTA40C/Zeimetz/Hwy14Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMelissa Maude / Cathy Feinstein vs Bronwen Greene / JB Robinson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTrish Scott / Vicki Bridges vs Shellie Corley / Sandy Shaw2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40+ Combo Women - 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Melissa Maude
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.77
Carolyn Hassey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Cathy Feinstein
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.61
Trish Scott
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.59
Michele Davenport
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Linda Musgrave
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Deborah B Bowyer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.51
Kelley Golden
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.47
Kelly Shuler
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.26
Sunny Davis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Daphne Wiles
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Johnel Searcy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Loran Hardigree
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Vicki Bridges
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelley Golden + Trish Scott6656% games+7.2% vs expected
Kelly Shuler + Carolyn Hassey6253% games+5.4% vs expected
Carolyn Hassey + Trish Scott4251% games+3.0% vs expected
Deborah B Bowyer + Linda Musgrave2549% games−2.0% vs expected
Melissa Maude + Trish Scott3355% games−9.9% vs expected
Kelly Shuler + Melissa Maude5350% gamesnot enough data
Kelley Golden + Kelly Shuler2344% gamesnot enough data
Kelley Golden + Melissa Maude4163% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa Maude
57W–27L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%1%99%
2.85
3
Carolyn Hassey
28W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Cathy Feinstein
10W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Trish Scott
30W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%22%78%
2.61
Michele Davenport
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
0%26%74%
2.59
Linda Musgrave
35W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
0%28%72%
2.58
3
Deborah B Bowyer
19W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.58
Kelley Golden
35W–41L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%48%52%
2.51
Kelly Shuler
23W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%57%43%
2.47
Sunny Davis
6W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
0%96%4%
2.26
2.5
Daphne Wiles
0W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Johnel Searcy
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Loran Hardigree
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Vicki Bridges
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.