Teams

Burbank/Memphis

2026 Adult 18 & Over -Memphis · 3.5 Men 18 & over

16 players · average NTRP 3.40 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-05-06vs Brackett/MemphisLost 05
L#1 DoublesBerkeley Burbank / Patrick Kerley vs Peyton Neal / Julio Lanfranco5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesClayton Eber vs Gabe LaBonia3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRichard Kuebler / Keith Yarrow vs Cade Bishop / ROBERT LEBLANC4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesPrice Edwards vs Trey Whitsitt2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMike Donoghue / Walter Hoehn vs Brandon Brackett / Jonathan Jussely0-6, 2-6
2026-04-18vs Day/MemphisLost 05
L#1 DoublesRichard Kuebler / Brian Eason vs Albert Kuhlo / George Edwards1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJoseph Koelsch vs Baker Williams6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMike Donoghue / Patrick Kerley vs Richmond Poindexter / Michael Moore5-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesMichael Rude vs Taylor Lackie1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRussell Smith / Price Edwards vs Barrett Day / Dusty Nelson2-6, 3-6
2026-03-21vs Heard / MemphisWon 40
W#1 DoublesKeith Yarrow / Clayton Eber vs Alan Kirk / John Stukenborg6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMichael Rude vs Eric Gibbs6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPatrick Kerley / Alex Neale vs Zane Coleman / Corey Richter6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCharles Coolidge / Ronald Solberg vs Edgar Contreras / Perry Green5-7, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Patrick Kerley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Clayton Eber
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Berkeley Burbank
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Alex Neale
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Michael Holder
published
3.19
Charles Coolidge
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Richard Kuebler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Michael Rude
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.12
Keith Yarrow
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.11
Joseph Koelsch
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.93
Price Edwards
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
Mike Donoghue
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.85
Walter Hoehn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
Brian Eason
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
E Cavett Ostner
published
Ronald Solberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Berkeley Burbank + Clayton Eber303 matchesnot enough data
Berkeley Burbank + Patrick Kerley213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patrick Kerley
12W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Clayton Eber
12W–10L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Berkeley Burbank
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Alex Neale
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Michael Holder
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.20
3.5
Charles Coolidge
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Richard Kuebler
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Michael Rude
20W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
3.14
Keith Yarrow
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
Joseph Koelsch
10W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.11
Price Edwards
19W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.93
Mike Donoghue
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
2.92
Walter Hoehn
12W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
2.85
3
Brian Eason
22W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
E Cavett Ostner
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Ronald Solberg
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.