Teams

Williams Y - Townsend

2026 Duval Combo 18 & Over - Spring · 5.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.86 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-17vs Shearwater - ArmstrongWon 30
W#1 DoublesAngela DuBois / Cheryl Dickson vs Elise Wirtz / Angela Uva6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesColette Lennox / Christina Biggers vs Tami Bender / Deborah Davies6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKatherine Shupe / Chelsea Mailhiot vs Janelle Modesitt / NANCY MBUTHIA6-1, 6-3
2026-06-10vs Planet Swim - MarsoniWon 21
W#1 DoublesAngela DuBois / Lindsay Somers vs Samantha Vanderbilt / Tina Larson6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesCheryl Dickson / Brenda Howard vs Jennifer Marsoni / Tatyana Cherepanova3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesTanya Ashe / Diane Pogue vs Nelda Guerra-Smith / Lisa Adams6-0, 6-4
2026-05-27vs Shearwater - ArmstrongWon 30
W#1 DoublesAngela DuBois / Lindsay Somers vs Maureen Ruiz / Dawn Barrack6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCheryl Dickson / Brenda Howard vs Kelly Bryant / Subashini Thomas3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary Townsend / Katherine Shupe vs Daria Ovodenko / Angela Uva6-3, 6-0
2026-05-20vs Planet Swim - MarsoniLost 12
L#1 DoublesAngela DuBois / Lindsay Somers vs Tina Larson / Rebecca Roberts6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBrenda Howard / Cheryl Dickson vs Sheila Pensotti / Tatyana Cherepanova6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChelsea Mailhiot / Tanya Ashe vs Jennifer Marsoni / Brooke Tsao6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-05-06vs Shearwater - ArmstrongWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristina Biggers / Colette Lennox vs Natasha Bogomazova / Marisa Burfeind4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDiane Pogue / Richa Jeetah vs Sara Drake / NANCY MBUTHIA6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChelsea Mailhiot / Tanya Ashe vs Subashini Thomas / Maria Del Pilar Diaz6-0, 6-2
2026-04-29vs Planet Swim - MarsoniLost 12
W#1 DoublesChristina Biggers / Angela DuBois vs Rebecca Roberts / Connie Aleman6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRicha Jeetah / Diane Pogue vs Samantha Vanderbilt / Brooke Tsao6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary Townsend / Brenda Howard vs Maggie MacElt / Pamela Brooking7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2026-04-23vs Planet Swim - MarsoniLost 12
L#1 DoublesTanya Ashe / Christina Biggers vs Julie Clampitt / Connie Aleman6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesColette Lennox / Lindsay Somers vs Nelda Guerra-Smith / Brooke Tsao7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRicha Jeetah / Mary Townsend vs Sheila Pensotti / Tatyana Cherepanova3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-04-15vs Shearwater - ArmstrongLost 12
W#1 DoublesCheryl Dickson / Angela DuBois vs Maureen Ruiz / Sara Drake6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAnn Garab / Brenda Howard vs Olesia Antoniuk / Marisa Burfeind4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTanya Ashe / Chelsea Mailhiot vs Tami Bender / Deborah Davies6-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Christina Biggers
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.91
Diane Pogue
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.90
Colette Lennox
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.78
Cheryl Dickson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.75
Lindsay Somers
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.75
Ann Garab
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Mary Townsend
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.74
Chelsea Mailhiot
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Tanya Ashe
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.69
Richa Jeetah
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.66
Angela DuBois
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.65
Katherine Shupe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela DuBois + Lindsay Somers314 matchesnot enough data
Tanya Ashe + Chelsea Mailhiot123 matchesnot enough data
Colette Lennox + Richa Jeetah213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Christina Biggers
18W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.95
3
Diane Pogue
2W–1L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%73%26%
2.91
2.5
Colette Lennox
12W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.90
3
Cheryl Dickson
6W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Lindsay Somers
7W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Ann Garab
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Mary Townsend
12W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Chelsea Mailhiot
7W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.74
Tanya Ashe
19W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%7%93%
2.71
Richa Jeetah
18W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%9%91%
2.69
2.5
Angela DuBois
11W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%13%87%
2.66
Katherine Shupe
7W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%15%85%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.