Teams

Payne Park Allerton

2022 Sarasota Adult 40 & Over Weekday · 4.0 W Tuesday

11 players · average NTRP 4.25 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-24vs Payne Park TempleLost 01
L#1 DoublesWendy Hillock / Kristin Knous vs Sue Green / Tracy Mediratta4-6, 2-6
2022-05-10vs Sarasota - Plantation/HortonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCherie Lopez / Wendy Hillock vs Diane Crews / Beth Costa7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMonica Darold / Paula Brown vs Susie Lentile / Janet Kramer1-6, 5-7
2022-05-03vs Laurel Oak Continental CrewLost 03
L#1 DoublesCherie Lopez / Wendy Hillock vs Yudi Carpenter / Tanya Keith4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLeanna Jackson vs Courtney Rosenthal3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Falkenstrom / Paula Brown vs Sandra Poston / Keely Crosby1-6, 5-7
2022-04-26vs SARASOTA - Longwood Wilson-SnyderLost 03
L#1 DoublesKristin Knous / Wendy Hillock vs Cindy Wilson-Snyder / Yvonne Ghilardi3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMargie Stauffer / Alison White vs Donna Hannigan / Anna Bacher Brown3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPaula Brown / Teresa Noa vs Lynn Inganamort / Michelle Coates1-6, 3-6
2022-04-19vs LWR EnglanderSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCherie Lopez / Wendy Hillock vs Donna Dubinsky / Kathy Rain2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMargie Stauffer / Nancy Platkin vs Meagan Milne / Geneil Roberts2-6, 0-6
2022-04-12vs LBK Public AllenWon 10
W#1 DoublesWendy Hillock / Cherie Lopez vs Sandy Schonhoff / Jennifer Maita6-1, 6-2
2022-04-05vs Laurel Oak Better Late Than NeverWon 10
W#2 DoublesSusan Falkenstrom / Paula Brown vs Amy Christensen / Marci Plattner6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 W Tuesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Wendy Hillock
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.80
Laura Naramore
published
3.76
Kristin Knous
published
Alison White
published 4
3.67
Mary Jane Waite
published
Leanna Jackson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Margie Stauffer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Platkin
published
Paula Brown
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Susan Falkenstrom
published
Vickie Miller
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Wendy Hillock
92W–68L career · 6 lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
3.95
Laura Naramore
17W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Kristin Knous
10W–3L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Alison White
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Jane Waite
50W–38L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
Leanna Jackson
31W–46L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Margie Stauffer
22W–15L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Platkin
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Paula Brown
24W–38L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Falkenstrom
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Vickie Miller
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.