Teams

J.Lake 18+

2023 Cap Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.81 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-11vs L.HOLDINGWon 31
W#1 DoublesJulie Raftery / Alexis Johnson vs Ashley Kerr / Amanda Williams6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesMelissa Liner vs Adrienne Brewer3-5
W#2 DoublesSusan Shaw / Andrea McCartney vs Martha Schneider / Melanie Tharrington6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesSusan Hembarsky vs Mindy Edwards0-6, 1-6
2023-05-10vs K.TSIBULSKYLost 12
L#1 SinglesJulie Raftery vs Connie Peterson1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Flanagan / Melissa Liner vs Mary Money / Kristal Nelson6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAndrea McCartney / Susan Shaw vs Suellen Bailey / Dolores Quesenberry7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2023-04-20vs T.Crisp 18Lost 12
L#1 SinglesJulie Raftery vs Virginia Jenkins0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMelissa Liner / Andrea McCartney vs Michele Adams / Erin Conigliaro3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJoyce Lake / Leslie Corn vs Sandy Wood / Danielle Stringer4-6, 1-6
2023-04-13vs D.SKIKO 18Lost 13
L#1 DoublesAlexis Johnson / Julie Raftery vs Aileen Carroll / Keri Allen5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Bricker / Melissa Liner vs Kesah DeLisio / Cybele Brockmann6-4, 6-4
L#2 SinglesAngela Pleasants vs Mary Jo Nugent6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLeigh Kimball / Andrea McCartney vs Regina Heroux / Laurie Randall4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-03-30vs L.HOLDINGWon 40
W#1 DoublesJennifer Bricker / Melissa Liner vs Tina Glover / Melanie Tharrington6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJulie Raftery vs Adrienne Brewer6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSherry Ingle / Leslie Corn vs Lucy Holding / Amanda Williams5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathryn Beth Beam / Leigh Kimball vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-03-23vs I.Gesher18Split 22
W#1 DoublesJennifer Bricker / Susan Flanagan vs Isabelle Homes Gesher / Brette Best4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJulie Raftery vs Mary Penn Lunger5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJoyce Lake / Andrea McCartney vs Brooke Somers / Carrie Vander Vennet1-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesSusan Hembarsky vs Melissa Rollman1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-03-16vs S.PowellWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Raftery / Alexis Johnson vs Heather Mittag / Ginger Sluder4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAngela Pleasants vs Laura Dwyer6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJoyce Lake / Leigh Kimball vs Erika Atkinson / Pam Rigsby2-6, 4-6
2023-03-02vs K.TSIBULSKYSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJulie Raftery vs Connie Peterson1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Bricker / Melissa Liner vs Katherine Jeske / Dolores Quesenberry6-1, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Jennifer Bricker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.63
Melissa Liner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.58
Andrea McCartney
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.52
Leigh Kimball
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
Julie Raftery
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.46
Kathryn Beth Beam
published
3.42
Angela Pleasants
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Sherry Ingle
published
3.18
Susan Hembarsky
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.05
Leslie Corn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.99
Joyce Lake
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela Pleasants + Julie Raftery5449% games+2.0% vs expected
Leslie Corn + Susan Hembarsky121151% games−2.1% vs expected
Jennifer Bricker + Leigh Kimball151355% games−5.8% vs expected
Andrea McCartney + Leigh Kimball2445% gamesnot enough data
Melissa Liner + Jennifer Bricker3347% gamesnot enough data
Leslie Corn + Andrea McCartney314 matchesnot enough data
Sherry Ingle + Susan Hembarsky224 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Liner + Susan Hembarsky314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jennifer Bricker
238W–222L career · 4 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Melissa Liner
166W–95L career · 6 lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.63
4
Andrea McCartney
146W–106L career · 5 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.58
4
Leigh Kimball
57W–73L career · 3 lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.52
4
Julie Raftery
156W–119L career · 8 lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
3.47
Kathryn Beth Beam
4W–14L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
Angela Pleasants
186W–93L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
Sherry Ingle
15W–12L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Susan Hembarsky
101W–133L career · 4 lines in 2023
9%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Leslie Corn
93W–72L career · 2 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.05
Joyce Lake
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
2.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.