Teams

GEPTA-3.5-Adult/M(Smith)(CCC)

2022 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE · 3.5 ADULT MEN

14 players · average NTRP 3.36 / GREATER EL PASO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
W#1 DoublesEnrique Mata / Chad Follett vs Antonio Marquez / Carlos Santini6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPeter Thompson / Danny Nassar vs Christian Lopez / JOSE MENDEZ6-4, 6-2
L#1 DoublesTyler Smith / Enrique Mata vs John Moore / Ed Savedra1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJacques McNeil vs Juan Acevedo3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJoe Mata / Jorge Kareh vs Michael Bailey / Roger Gonzalez1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesOctavio Corral vs Bert Woolard3-6, 3-6
2021-09-18vs GEPTA-3.5-Adult/M(Niederleig)(TW#1)Split 22
W#1 DoublesTito Herrera / Eddie Nassar vs Christian Lopez / Antonio Marquez6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesEnrique Mata / Jorge Kareh vs Eric Swanson / Raymond Brothers2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesOctavio Corral vs Brenden Hamari4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJacques McNeil / Peter Thompson vs Carlos Santini / JOSE MENDEZ6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 ADULT MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Enrique Mata
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Danny Nassar
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Jacques McNeil
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.24
Alejandro Orozco
published 3.5
2.93
Eddie Nassar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Chad Follett
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3
2.66
Craig Fortune
published 3
Joe Mata
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jorge Kareh
usually #2 Singles 30%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Ludovico Eduardo Soto
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Octavio Corral
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Rami Abdeljabet
published
Ruben Ramirez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tito Herrera
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ruben Ramirez + Jorge Kareh4545% games+1.5% vs expected
Craig Fortune + Eddie Nassar0640% games−6.4% vs expected
Eddie Nassar + Danny Nassar2539% games−13.3% vs expected
Eddie Nassar + Tito Herrera2447% gamesnot enough data
Alejandro Orozco + Tito Herrera1543% gamesnot enough data
Craig Fortune + Jorge Kareh2347% gamesnot enough data
Danny Nassar + Ruben Ramirez134 matchesnot enough data
Tito Herrera + Jorge Kareh134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Enrique Mata
58W–110L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Danny Nassar
19W–43L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Jacques McNeil
8W–27L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Alejandro Orozco
23W–40L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Eddie Nassar
38W–61L career · 3 lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
2.93
3
Chad Follett
6W–18L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Craig Fortune
25W–62L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
2.66
Joe Mata
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Jorge Kareh
74W–111L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ludovico Eduardo Soto
38W–23L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Octavio Corral
32W–31L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rami Abdeljabet
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ruben Ramirez
31W–49L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tito Herrera
15W–51L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.