Teams

Piney Run - DC

2022 DC WTA Adult 18 & Over Spring · DC WTA Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.30 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-04vs Serve It UpWon 30
W#1 DoublesSteven Park / Christopher Banks vs James Shevlin / Todd Eisenstadt6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJon Anders vs Daren Bakst4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGerald Anekwe / Joel Hardi vs Peter Tice / Richard McKeon6-3, 3-4
2022-05-21vs Serve It UpLost 12
W#1 DoublesChristopher Banks / Steven Park vs Peter Levine / Richard McKeon6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesGerald Anekwe vs Daren Bakst7-6
L#2 SinglesBroderick Smith vs Todd Whatley2-6, 4-5
2022-05-15vs Serve It UpSplit 11
L#1 SinglesThomas Calhoun vs Todd Whatley1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesChristopher Banks / Joel Hardi vs James Shevlin / Daren Bakst7-6, 3-2
2022-05-14vs Serve It UpWon 21
W#1 DoublesSteven Park / Thomas Calhoun vs Raymond Barry / Todd Whatley6-4, 4-4
W#1 SinglesMark Hill vs Daren Bakst7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKerem Bilge / Lycurtis Wortham vs Peter Levine / James Shevlin2-6, 4-6
2022-04-24vs Serve It UpSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSteven Park / Thomas Calhoun vs Raymond Barry / Richard McKeon6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJon Anders vs Daren Bakst6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGerald Anekwe / Kerem Bilge vs Chungchi Yao / James Shevlin3-6, 4-4
L#3 DoublesQuincy Gant / Martin Booker vs Todd Eisenstadt / Peter Levine2-6, 4-6
2022-04-16vs Serve It UpWon 21
W#1 DoublesLycurtis Wortham / Steven Gibau vs James Shevlin / Chungchi Yao1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoel Hardi / Martin Booker vs Peter Tice / Richard McKeon4-6, 4-3
W#2 SinglesMark Hill vs Todd Whatley6-2, 6-1
2022-04-09vs Serve It UpWon 21
W#1 DoublesDesmond LaMar / Lycurtis Wortham vs Raymond Barry / Chungchi Yao6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesBroderick Smith vs John Gregory0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJon Anders / Thomas Calhoun vs Peter Tice / Todd Eisenstadt6-1, 6-3
2022-04-02vs Serve It UpLost 03
L#1 SinglesMark Hill vs Daren Bakst4-6, 5-5
L#2 DoublesJoel Hardi / Martin Booker vs James Shevlin / Todd Whatley5-7, 1-4
L#2 SinglesThomas Calhoun vs John Sommer3-6, 5-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · DC WTA Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Gamettes82351529307
2Piney Run - DC82341632317
3Hains Point Killer Bees36162960398

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Christopher Banks
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Steven Park
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Jon Anders
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Gerald Anekwe
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
Steven Gibau
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.79
Desmond LaMar
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.50
Penelope Wilson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.46
Broderick Smith
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
Joel Hardi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kerem Bilge
published
Lycurtis Wortham
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mark Hill
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Martin Booker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Thomas Calhoun
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christopher Banks + Gerald Anekwe6261% games+1.1% vs expected
Christopher Banks + Steven Park6079% gamesnot enough data
Steven Gibau + Desmond LaMar303 matchesnot enough data
Steven Park + Gerald Anekwe213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christopher Banks
55W–19L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.43
Steven Park
57W–40L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Jon Anders
60W–44L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Gerald Anekwe
28W–19L career · 3 lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Steven Gibau
167W–242L career · 4 lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.02
3
Desmond LaMar
101W–129L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
Penelope Wilson
36W–64L career · 1 line in 2022
50%50%<1%
2.50
3
Broderick Smith
11W–15L career · 2 lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
2.46
Joel Hardi
12W–10L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kerem Bilge
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lycurtis Wortham
15W–19L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mark Hill
22W–13L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Martin Booker
1W–13L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Thomas Calhoun
5W–4L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.