Teams

RP: Miller

2024 RI Adult 18 & Over Women · 2.5 Women 1

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / RHODE ISLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-19vs RW: HerzogLost 12
L#1 DoublesPaula Campbell / Mathangi Venkataraman Subbu vs Jillian Torgan / Nittaya Saenbut0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKailyn Lepert vs Meher Manda6-2, 3-6, 3-1
L#2 DoublesKylie Vigliotti / Margaret Rossoni vs Erin Mooney / Karen George2-6, 4-6
2024-07-14vs RP: Joan SteereLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusanna Ordway / Angelica Provost vs Leah Kiernan / Jessica Ricci3-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesKailyn Lepert vs Ainsley Doherty6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesPaula Campbell / Mathangi Venkataraman Subbu vs Anna Maria Bertorelli / Jan Boyd1-6, 0-6
2024-07-06vs RP: Rookies/Steere/PowersLost 12
W#1 DoublesPaula Campbell / Kylie Vigliotti vs Katie Powers / Andrea Ross5-7, 6-2, 5-4
L#1 SinglesSusanna Ordway vs Laura Antoniello0-6, 6-2, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLindsay Tahan / Angelica Provost vs Rena Sheehan / Maureen Donnelly1-6, 3-6
2024-06-23vs KCC: IlluzziWon 21
W#1 DoublesAngelica Bovis / CAITLYN VALLEE vs Jennifer Parent / Wendy Riordan6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKailyn Lepert vs Kristin Dwyer1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSusanna Ordway / Melanie Moreno vs Hailey Mendes / Jennifer Kilsey6-3, 3-6, 3-1
2024-06-17vs RW: HerzogLost 12
W#1 DoublesCAITLYN VALLEE / Kylie Vigliotti vs Nittaya Saenbut / Petra Jenkins4-6, 6-4, 3-2
L#1 SinglesSusanna Ordway vs Erin Mooney5-7, 3-5
L#2 DoublesMelanie Moreno / Angelica Provost vs Jillian Torgan / Elaine Colgan2-6, 1-6
2024-06-09vs RP: Rookies/Steere/PowersLost 12
W#1 DoublesCAITLYN VALLEE / Kailyn Lepert vs Katie Powers / Beth Marso6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAngelica Bovis vs Laura Antoniello6-2, 2-6, 5-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Gemma / Lindsay Tahan vs Rena Sheehan / Maureen Donnelly2-6, 0-6
2024-06-01vs KCC: IlluzziLost 03
L#1 DoublesKylie Vigliotti / Susanna Ordway vs Sherry DeMarco / Erin Illuzzi0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKassidy Correia vs Wendy Riordan6-7, 3-4
L#2 DoublesMelanie Moreno / Angelica Provost vs Hailey Mendes / Jennifer London0-6, 1-6
2024-05-25vs RP: Joan SteereLost 03
L#1 DoublesKassidy Correia / Lindsay Tahan vs Leah Kiernan / Libby Chapralis1-6, 7-6, 0-3
L#1 SinglesPaula Campbell vs Emily Costa0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKylie Vigliotti / Mathangi Venkataraman Subbu vs Stephanie Carvalhal / Karen Chretien3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2.5 Women 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KCC: Illuzzi0816817170
2RW: Herzog08141024213
3RP: Rookies/Steere/Powers08101432241
4RP: Miller0871738270

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.13 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Evelyn L Miller
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
CAITLYN VALLEE
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.40
Lindsay Tahan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.28
Kylie Vigliotti
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
1.97
Paula Campbell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
1.89
Angelica Provost
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Angelica Bovis
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Jessica Gemma
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kailyn Lepert
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Kassidy Correia
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Margaret Rossoni
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mathangi Venkataraman Subbu
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Melanie Moreno
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Susanna Ordway
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melanie Moreno + Angelica Provost044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Evelyn L Miller
21W–15L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
CAITLYN VALLEE
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lindsay Tahan
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%78%22%
2.40
Kylie Vigliotti
12W–11L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%96%4%
2.28
Paula Campbell
5W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.97
2.5
Angelica Provost
0W–11L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.89
Angelica Bovis
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jessica Gemma
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Kailyn Lepert
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kassidy Correia
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Margaret Rossoni
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Mathangi Venkataraman Subbu
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Melanie Moreno
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Susanna Ordway
1W–7L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.