Teams

Fee - Luer

2025 Brevard Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-03vs EFSC - LeiterWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle Dunn / Renee Jiannine vs Tanishia Henderson / Christine Small2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-02-26vs RCCB - HingleWon 10
W#1 SinglesKatharyn Luer vs Stephanie Lasko6-2, 6-2
2025-02-17vs Suntree - FordWon 20
W#2 DoublesRenee Jiannine / Kristi Swor vs Amy McCleery / Tandy Baerst6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Michelle Dunn vs Marianne Fraser / JANETTE TABOR6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-02-03vs EFSC - TaylorWon 20
W#1 DoublesRenee Jiannine / Robynn Ross vs Carol Roesch / Jane Bonvillain6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Kristi Swor vs Teresa Osborn / Eileen Stapleton6-1, 6-2
2025-01-29vs Suntree - MikaLost 01
L#3 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Michelle Dunn vs Rebecca Thompson / Kathryn Nitti6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-01-27vs Kiwi - SalvatoreLost 01
L#1 SinglesKatharyn Luer vs Melissa Yanko6-7, 1-6
2025-01-13vs Brevard/Aboud/40&Over3.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesRenee Jiannine / Katharyn Luer vs Megan Holthaus / Diana Hayslip2-6, 4-6
2025-01-06vs Rockledge Rebels - MullowneyLost 02
L#1 SinglesKatharyn Luer vs Cindy Cozad2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRenee Jiannine / Milena Alicea vs Linda Carrillo / April Sanders0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Leslie Love
published
2.93
Renee Jiannine
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.91
Katharyn Luer
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.81
Milena Alicea
published
2.79
Laura Rouveyrol
published
2.78
Kristi Swor
published
2.75
Brenda Tarquinio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Michelle Dunn
published
2.52
Mona Peterson
published
2.50
Lael Woods
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katharyn Luer + Renee Jiannine13659% games+11.2% vs expected
Laura Rouveyrol + Katharyn Luer134 matchesnot enough data
Lael Woods + Brenda Tarquinio213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leslie Love
17W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.28
3
Renee Jiannine
104W–89L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Katharyn Luer
158W–172L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.91
Milena Alicea
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Laura Rouveyrol
16W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
Kristi Swor
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
2.78
3
Brenda Tarquinio
22W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Michelle Dunn
12W–12L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
Mona Peterson
8W–28L career · no lines in 2025
0%45%55%
2.52
Lael Woods
18W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%49%51%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.