Teams

JMorse/KJones (Queens)

2024 Mixed Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Mixed 3.5 - Mon PM

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-22Won 20
W#2 DoublesGreg Hobby / Teresa Riley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJohn Clayton / Alison Oxendine vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-15vs CLin (WSRC)Split 11
W#1 DoublesJohn Haviland / Abbey Ellis vs Silvia Petrikis / Gary Usher6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Clayton / Cathy Cagney vs Anne Cutts / Adam Dawson2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-07-08vs PStyers/KMelker (Southampton)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesJohn Haviland / Abbey Ellis vs Christine Barnes / Robert Kampmeyer6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJeff Morse / Alison Oxendine vs Pauline Styers / Pat Greathouse0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRONALD TOWNSEND / Cathy Cagney vs Teri Iezzi / Don Miller2-6, 3-6
2024-07-01vs CMiles (Jeff Adams)Won 20
W#1 DoublesAbbey Ellis / John Haviland vs Zack Johnson / Karen Morgan7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCathy Cagney / John Clayton vs FpommeFrances Pommells / Taylor Brown6-1, 6-0
2024-06-24Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMatthew King / Teresa Riley vs Sean OLeary / Shannon Grant6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2024-06-17vs TFunderburk (Life Time)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesGreg Hobby / Alison Oxendine vs Dana Ferguson / Stephen Polacek7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2024-06-03vs DDemaine (Queens)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesGreg Hobby / Teresa Riley vs Cameron Lober / Linda Lober3-6, 3-6
2024-05-20vs HFranc (Piper Glen)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCathy Cagney / John Haviland vs Katy Walters / Aaron Hampton4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Mixed 3.5 - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Elisa Salim
published 4
3.33
Kris Jones
published
3.31
Cathy Cagney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Matthew King
published
3.24
Abbey Ellis
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.23
RONALD TOWNSEND
published
3.21
John Clayton
published
3.08
Greg Hobby
published
3.05
John Haviland
published
2.96
Teresa Riley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.79
Alison Oxendine
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Jeff Morse
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elisa Salim
71W–27L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Kris Jones
18W–17L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Cathy Cagney
47W–45L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
Matthew King
7W–14L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Abbey Ellis
49W–43L career · 6 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
RONALD TOWNSEND
12W–11L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.23
John Clayton
18W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%7%93%
3.21
Greg Hobby
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%29%71%
3.08
John Haviland
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
3.05
3
Teresa Riley
70W–74L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Alison Oxendine
53W–97L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
Jeff Morse
7W–16L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.