Teams

Staines/18/6.5/CM/Lksd

2026 NO Southern Combo 18 & Over - Men · 6.5 NO (18&O) Men

14 players · average NTRP / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 1 played
Sep 16 7:00 PM
Green Acres Country Club
Sep 23 7:00 PM
Xavier University of Louisiana
Sep 30 6:30 PM
Lakeside Country Club
Oct 5 6:30 PM
Lakeside Country Club
2026-08-31vs Schaff/18/6.5/CM/CPWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarc Schexnayder / Greg Harris vs Jake Rosenfeld / Carl Monvoisin6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesChad Caldwell / Jim Buchler vs Chris Raff / Eric Kaufman1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStephen Joubert / Scott Sarrat vs Isaac Mudge / David Weiland6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 6.5 NO (18&O) Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Cole/18//6.5/CM/GACC000000
2Schaff/18/6.5/CM/CP000000
3Page/18/6.5/CM/XU000000
4Staines/18/6.5/CM/Lksd000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Marc Schexnayder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Jason Bonnet
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Mark Staines
published
3.27
George Zacharia
published
3.24
Ninh Tran
published
3.11
Jim Buchler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Josh Mannino
published
3.06
William McSweeney
published
3.04
James Oertling
published
2.99
Joe Schick
published
2.97
Scott Sarrat
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Frank Quinn
published
2.84
Kyle Condon
published
Stephen Joubert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Sarrat + Joe Schick314 matchesnot enough data
Jim Buchler + Ninh Tran303 matchesnot enough data
Jim Buchler + Mark Staines303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marc Schexnayder
20W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.52
Jason Bonnet
56W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.50
Mark Staines
28W–7L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
George Zacharia
9W–6L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Ninh Tran
40W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.24
Jim Buchler
39W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.11
Josh Mannino
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
23%76%<1%
3.10
William McSweeney
8W–4L career · no lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.06
James Oertling
7W–0L career · no lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.04
Joe Schick
6W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
Scott Sarrat
17W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
Frank Quinn
15W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%77%22%
2.89
Kyle Condon
12W–5L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%13%
2.84
Stephen Joubert
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.