Teams

CSRC SALMON

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - SOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - SOCO

9 players · average NTRP 3.70 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-09-07vs CSRC BROCKSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCaron Dumler / Amanda Irons vs Marian Nelson / Martha Walker7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMonica MacLiz vs Eliza Montoya6-2, 6-3
2023-08-31vs LTFCS MUELLERLost 02
L#1 DoublesMelissa Gateley / Monica MacLiz vs Amy Obenchain / Ruth Zwolinski4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesAmanda Irons vs Patricia Sarmiento3-6, 3-6
2023-08-17vs LFTCS WISNERWon 20
W#1 DoublesOlivia Salmon / Caron Dumler vs Linda Edgar / Sara Callender7-5, 7-6
W#1 SinglesMonica MacLiz vs Lisa VanDeVeer6-1, 6-2
2023-08-03vs FLYHS COUTURESplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmanda Irons / Caron Dumler vs Gina Scheper / Kristi Couture2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMonica MacLiz vs Kaleigh Doke6-1, 6-3
2023-07-27vs CCOC BOOKSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCaron Dumler / Olivia Salmon vs Tracy Coons / Janet Luce6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMonica MacLiz / Melissa Gateley vs Allison Johnson / Mary Simmons7-6, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Olivia Salmon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Monica MacLiz
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.55
Theresa Watson
published
3.19
Jennifer Furr
published
3.18
Amanda Irons
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Caron Dumler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Aimee Anderson
published 3.5
2.96
Katherine Crumpton
published
2.89
Melissa Gateley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caron Dumler + Amanda Irons5948% games−5.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Olivia Salmon
56W–33L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Monica MacLiz
57W–47L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
Theresa Watson
4W–14L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.55
Jennifer Furr
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Amanda Irons
26W–36L career · 3 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Caron Dumler
52W–59L career · 4 lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Aimee Anderson
20W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.10
Katherine Crumpton
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
2.96
Melissa Gateley
29W–23L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.