Teams

Ky/LEX/Jenkins

2024 USTA LEAGUE 40 & Over ADULT LEXINGTON · Women 4.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Emily Osborne
published
3.75
3.71
Hiroko Nakata
published
3.64
Kristin Coffey
published
3.61
Holly Hasler
published
3.54
Carmen Amato
published 3.5
3.44
Nicole Norfleet
published
3.44
Kavonne B. Webb
published
3.41
Susan Toth
published
3.39
Janine Coy
published
3.29
Jeannie Guskey
published
Brooks Lundy
published 3.5
3.25
Ann Denny
published 3.5
3.16
Nancy Bailey
published
Dorothy Meng
published
Leslie Simpson
published
Marika Wesolosky
published
Mary Ringle
published
Vicki van Winkle
published
Wendy Kogler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Montgomery + Nancy Bailey3256% games+8.5% vs expected
Elizabeth Montgomery + Carmen Amato7163% games+4.0% vs expected
Elizabeth Montgomery + Kavonne B. Webb2345% games−4.2% vs expected
Nancy Bailey + Carmen Amato2341% games−4.6% vs expected
Kristin Coffey + Hiroko Nakata134 matchesnot enough data
Kavonne B. Webb + Nancy Bailey044 matchesnot enough data
Ann Denny + Kavonne B. Webb303 matchesnot enough data
Kavonne B. Webb + Carmen Amato303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Osborne
37W–18L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.81
Elizabeth Montgomery
24W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%4%96%
3.75
Hiroko Nakata
37W–24L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
Kristin Coffey
13W–15L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.64
Holly Hasler
12W–8L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
3.5
Carmen Amato
37W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.54
Nicole Norfleet
7W–28L career · no lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
3.44
Kavonne B. Webb
16W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
Susan Toth
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%26%
3.41
Janine Coy
64W–32L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%22%
3.39
Jeannie Guskey
11W–15L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Brooks Lundy
1W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Ann Denny
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Nancy Bailey
16W–16L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
Dorothy Meng
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Leslie Simpson
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marika Wesolosky
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Ringle
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Vicki van Winkle
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Wendy Kogler
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.