Teams

Match Makers

2022 Montgomery Adult Other Women's Day Fall · Montgomery Adult Other Women's Day Fall 3.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other Women's Day Fall 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Zoie Acadia
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.34
Ann-Lee Chen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Rona Gomez
published
3.28
Sally Bailey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Shelley Puterman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Cathy Pasquariello
published 3.5
3.24
Yvette Fontenot
published
3.24
JoAnn Ward
published
3.22
Alexis Feringa
published 3.5
3.19
Tamara Clarke
published
3.03
Bettina Lynn
published 3.5
2.78
Palmer Dorn
published
2.78
Andrea Foster
published 3
Laveta Duke
published
Mary Lynn Shanahan
published
Mazie Efinger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tamara Clarke + Sally Bailey303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Zoie Acadia
359W–171L career · 4 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
3.5
Ann-Lee Chen
216W–224L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.34
Rona Gomez
90W–46L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Sally Bailey
73W–71L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Shelley Puterman
86W–69L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Cathy Pasquariello
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Yvette Fontenot
17W–27L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
JoAnn Ward
35W–38L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Alexis Feringa
15W–15L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
Tamara Clarke
57W–80L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Bettina Lynn
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.03
Palmer Dorn
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.78
3
Andrea Foster
28W–29L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
2.78
Laveta Duke
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Lynn Shanahan
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mazie Efinger
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.