Teams

Bourgeois/55/6.5/CWD/BREC

2026 BR Southern Combo 55 & Over - Women Day · 6.5 BR (55&O) Women Day

13 players · average NTRP 3.10 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 18 10:30 AM
BREC City Park Tennis Center
Sep 25 9:00 AM
BREC City Park Tennis Center
Oct 2 9:00 AM
BREC City Park Tennis Center
Oct 16 9:00 AM
BREC City Park Tennis Center
2026-09-04vs McLindon/55/6.5/CWD/BRECLost 03
L#1 DoublesCynthia Chustz / Kay Lambert vs Katherine Overland / Carole Wilkins2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJudith Niland / Marsha Jabour vs Claire Piland / Laurie Saurage3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Bogan / Diane Henderson vs Meghan McCracken / MaryClaire Hotard4-6, 2-6
2026-08-28vs McLindon/55/6.5/CWD/BRECWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarrie Bourgeois / Michelle Matherne vs Michele Mclindon / MaryClaire Hotard6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJanet Babin / Diane Henderson vs Claire Piland / Angela DeJean6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMary Santoro / Rachel Cherco vs Shona McCoy / Kelly Elkins6-1, 7-5
2026-08-21vs McLindon/55/6.5/CWD/BRECLost 12
L#1 DoublesCynthia Chustz / Patrice LeJeune vs Katherine Overland / Patti Carter0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCarrie Bourgeois / Michelle Matherne vs Roslyn Butler / Shona McCoy6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMarsha Jabour / Cinda Terral vs MaryClaire Hotard / Stephanie MacIasz3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.5 BR (55&O) Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1McLindon/55/6.5/CWD/BREC000000
2Bourgeois/55/6.5/CWD/BREC000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Michelle Matherne
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Cynthia Chustz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Carrie Bourgeois
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.92
Janet Babin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Mary Santoro
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Rachel Cherco
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Cinda Terral
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Diane Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.65
Kay Lambert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Marsha Jabour
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.56
Patrice LeJeune
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Carol Bogan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Judith Niland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Bogan + Diane Henderson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Matherne
14W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.28
3.5
Cynthia Chustz
5W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
3
Carrie Bourgeois
11W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
Janet Babin
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
73%27%<1%
2.92
Mary Santoro
25W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
Rachel Cherco
17W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Cinda Terral
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Diane Henderson
9W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
Kay Lambert
6W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
Marsha Jabour
17W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
2.64
Patrice LeJeune
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.56
3
Carol Bogan
7W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
40%60%<1%
2.54
Judith Niland
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.