Teams

Keswick-Ratcliffe

2023 Charlottesville Tri-Level 18 & Over · 4.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.80 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-11-02vs ACAC-BazydloLost 01
L#3 DoublesMerrily Main D'Arpino / Melissa Zeller vs Lauren Suggs / Beth Hollen3-6, 4-6
2023-10-30vs FCC-Waters/GavinLost 01
L#3 DoublesMarcy MacGovern / Bridget Atwell vs Ashley McCarron / Megan Long4-6, 3-6
2023-10-28vs ACAC-BazydloLost 01
L#3 DoublesMerrily Main D'Arpino / Marcy MacGovern vs Beth Hollen / Lauren Suggs0-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-10-21Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMerrily Main D'Arpino / Melissa Zeller vs Maya Mathew / Ellen Hayes2-6, 2-6
2023-10-05Won 10
W#3 DoublesBridget Atwell / Merrily Main D'Arpino vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-09-30vs BHSC-ParkerWon 10
W#3 DoublesJanie Shrader / Melissa Zeller vs Maya Mathew / Cate Zahl4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-09-22vs FCC-Waters/GavinLost 01
L#3 DoublesTia Schurecht / Melissa Zeller vs Joan Carlson / Isabel LeBoutillier2-6, 2-6
2023-09-21vs ACAC-BazydloLost 01
L#3 DoublesTia Schurecht / Bridget Atwell vs Susan Bayliss / Beth Hollen4-6, 2-6
2023-09-14vs BHSC-ParkerLost 01
L#3 DoublesMerrily Main D'Arpino / Marcy MacGovern vs Belinda Blankenship / Ellen Hayes7-6, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Ellen Markowitz
published 4.5
3.77
Lisa Jett
published
3.63
Kristin Carter
published
Bridget Atwell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Merrily Main D'Arpino
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Patti Rowe
published
3.10
Melissa Zeller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Janie Shrader
published
Marcy MacGovern
published
Tia Schurecht
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Merrily Main D'Arpino + Melissa Zeller2441% gamesnot enough data
Bridget Atwell + Melissa Zeller134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ellen Markowitz
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
28%71%<1%
4.07
Lisa Jett
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Elizabeth Ratcliffe
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kristin Carter
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Bridget Atwell
44W–51L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Merrily Main D'Arpino
151W–107L career · 10 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.22
Patti Rowe
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Melissa Zeller
121W–104L career · 4 lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
3.10
Janie Shrader
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Marcy MacGovern
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tia Schurecht
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.